1977
DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(77)90009-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some new group divisible designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the partially balanced designs given by Clatworthy (1973) can be written as generalized cyclic designs. More recently, John & Turner (1977) and Freeman (1976) have given further examples of group divisible designs obtained in this way. More recently, John & Turner (1977) and Freeman (1976) have given further examples of group divisible designs obtained in this way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the partially balanced designs given by Clatworthy (1973) can be written as generalized cyclic designs. More recently, John & Turner (1977) and Freeman (1976) have given further examples of group divisible designs obtained in this way. More recently, John & Turner (1977) and Freeman (1976) have given further examples of group divisible designs obtained in this way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 1, group divisible designs with S, S R and R numbers, B numbers, D numbers, J numbers, F numbers, and SN numbers are from Clatworthy (1973), Bhagwandas and Parihar (1980), Dey (1977), John and Turner (1977), Freeman (1976), and Sinha (1987) respectively. …”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the remaining sections, apart from those designs (06527) 14 5 10 (0 1 2 4 6) (0 1 4 7 9) 0-8601 10 B71 (08552) whose duals have concurrences differing by more than one, the difference between the efficiency factor and the upper bound shows that the designs are close to the best possible. These partially balanced designs are given by Clatworthy (1973), with the exception of Section C2, v = 24 for which the corresponding partially balanced design is Design 3 of John & Turner (1977). In four of these cases, designs whose duals are balanced or partially balanced and which have optimal efficiency factor are known.…”
Section: The Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%