1981
DOI: 10.2307/2232834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Long Run Features of Dynamic Time Series Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the method outlined in Currie (1981), the solution to the equations has two parts; first, a long-run equilibrium solution in which the level of the dependent variable depends upon the levels of the independent variables, and then a dynamic solution in which the level of the dependent variable depends upon the rates of growth of the independent variables. Rewriting the resulting employment equations in terms of labour productivity enables the solutions to where E = employment, Q = output, exp = exponential, g = growth rate of output.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Error-correction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the method outlined in Currie (1981), the solution to the equations has two parts; first, a long-run equilibrium solution in which the level of the dependent variable depends upon the levels of the independent variables, and then a dynamic solution in which the level of the dependent variable depends upon the rates of growth of the independent variables. Rewriting the resulting employment equations in terms of labour productivity enables the solutions to where E = employment, Q = output, exp = exponential, g = growth rate of output.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Error-correction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But such a representation is over-specified, containing terms that are not necessary to the explanation, just as multiplying (11) must be zero. Currie (1981) emphasized this interpretation, and it clearly provides a way of forcing dynamic specifications to exhibit first-order trend neutrality. Applied to (13), the mean lag is a1b( 1 -/3), confirming the previous conclusion that zero discounting would generate the desired neutrality.…”
Section: Target Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the error correction mechanism (ECM) is consistent with static‐equilibrium homogeneity postulates by construction, although care is required to ensure sensible behaviour in growth scenarios (see inter alia Currie (), Hendry and Von Ungern‐Sternberg (), Salmon (), Kloek (), Patterson and Ryding () and Hendry and Richard ()). Here, ‘equilibrium’ is a contextual concept defined by ‘all change ceasing’, and is not an assertion about behaviour over a long‐run of real time (see Spanos ()).…”
Section: Theory Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%