1996
DOI: 10.1002/sca.1996.4950180606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some limitations of surface profile reconstruction in scanning electron microscopy

Abstract: Summary: This paper is a contribution to development of electron beam profilography based on the so called "shape from shading" technique. A new formula of signal processing in a two detector system has been proposed. The formula cn be applied to all the signals showing Lambert's angular distribution. The signal processing may be realized in "real time" in a simple analog processing system. However, an accuracy of the profiles is limited by numerous errors, mainly by shadowing effects. As the shadowing causes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2a). The current I A,B of SEs flowing (along the straight trajectories) to one of the opposite detectors (A or B) can be described by the formula (Czepkowski & Słówko, 1996): and after further mathematical operations takes the form: where Ω A ,… are electron detection solid angles, ϕ p , θ p are the surface inclination angle and azimuth angle, γ is the electron emission angle, i 0 is the angular current density at ϕ p = 0 (proportional to the coefficient of SE emission δ o ), n depends on a material, and n ≈ 1 for materials with medium atomic numbers, about 30. Successively, c A,B and d A,B are coefficients depending on the detector geometry, defined as: …”
Section: Surface Topography Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2a). The current I A,B of SEs flowing (along the straight trajectories) to one of the opposite detectors (A or B) can be described by the formula (Czepkowski & Słówko, 1996): and after further mathematical operations takes the form: where Ω A ,… are electron detection solid angles, ϕ p , θ p are the surface inclination angle and azimuth angle, γ is the electron emission angle, i 0 is the angular current density at ϕ p = 0 (proportional to the coefficient of SE emission δ o ), n depends on a material, and n ≈ 1 for materials with medium atomic numbers, about 30. Successively, c A,B and d A,B are coefficients depending on the detector geometry, defined as: …”
Section: Surface Topography Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have developed a multiple detector system based on a quadruple Everhart–Thornley unit for SEs (Slówko, 1999; Slówko & Drzazga, 2000), though a four‐quadrant backscattered electron (BSE) detector is also a good option (Pintus et al , 2005). This time, the mathematical model developed earlier (Czepkowski & Słówko, 1996) was a basis for the errors analysis resulting in proper formulas and algorithms of their compensation realized by a computer (Paluszynski & Slówko, 2005; Drzazga et al , 2006; Paluszynski & Slówko, 2006). Measurements of the surface roughness are a useful addition to the fully 3D imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying model (9) to a measured BSE image (BL or BR) at each point (pixel), we could estimate the underlying corresponding shadowless BSE image intensities from the measured ones, provided the shadowing angles for each point are known. Furthermore, there is no need to treat the points with shadowing errors separately from those without such errors, since the image intensity at a point without a shadowing effect (shadowing angles should be zero after implementation of the thresholding operator) remains the same after applying (9). Therefore, in contrast to a literature example [11], this case does not require an image segmentation process to extract shadowing regions, which is generally very difficult to implement.…”
Section: Modified Shadowing Compensation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the so-called "shape from shading" problem, well studied in the computer vision literature (Zhang, 1999). However, applying such computer vision techniques to SEM images yields unreliable results (Czepkowshi, 1996). In this chapter we propose a semi-automated approach to measuring nanofibrils with high accuracy.…”
Section: Quantification Of Fibril Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%