1998
DOI: 10.1006/exer.1997.0423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Kinetic Properties of Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity in Cell Extracts from a Mammalian (Ovine) Corneal Epithelium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 47 ] In fact, G6PDH that produces NADPH and induces coacervate formation exhibits high affinity for G6P and NADP + (K M values for G6P and NADP + are ≈2.0 × 10 −5 M and ≈2.0 × 10 −6 M, respectively), [ 48 ] while LDH involved in the consumption has relatively low affinity for NADPH (≈4.55 × 10 −3 M) and high affinity toward pyruvate (K M value ≈ 2.0 × 10 −5 M). [ 48‐51 ] This is consistent with our observation that the NADPH‐coacervate dissolution behavior is more sensitive to the changes in pyruvate concentration compared to changes in that of LDH. [ 52,53 ] Moreover, considering that our enzymatic network design incorporates two competing enzymes, LDH and G6PDH, the substantial difference in affinity for NADPH and NADP + may further amplify this tendency; the three orders of magnitude difference in affinity of G6PDH for NADP + compared to LDH for NADPH suggests a significantly faster NADPH production rate than consumption.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…[ 47 ] In fact, G6PDH that produces NADPH and induces coacervate formation exhibits high affinity for G6P and NADP + (K M values for G6P and NADP + are ≈2.0 × 10 −5 M and ≈2.0 × 10 −6 M, respectively), [ 48 ] while LDH involved in the consumption has relatively low affinity for NADPH (≈4.55 × 10 −3 M) and high affinity toward pyruvate (K M value ≈ 2.0 × 10 −5 M). [ 48‐51 ] This is consistent with our observation that the NADPH‐coacervate dissolution behavior is more sensitive to the changes in pyruvate concentration compared to changes in that of LDH. [ 52,53 ] Moreover, considering that our enzymatic network design incorporates two competing enzymes, LDH and G6PDH, the substantial difference in affinity for NADPH and NADP + may further amplify this tendency; the three orders of magnitude difference in affinity of G6PDH for NADP + compared to LDH for NADPH suggests a significantly faster NADPH production rate than consumption.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…0.03 µmol s -1 mg -1 LDH. Although somewhat lower than values reported in the literature [20,29], the estimate for vmax on the CP-MWCNT support appear to be of an acceptable agreement, considering the particular 3-dimensional nanometric support.…”
Section: Electroless Enzymatic Testscontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…Thus, LDH was measured to assess the role of conjunctival epithelium in corneal regeneration (Thoft and Friend, 1977), and was correlated with energy needs for epithelial migration in the healing of corneal wounds (Kuwabara, Perkins and Cogan, 1976). LDH has also been used as a marker of cell integrity in the corneal stroma and epithelium (Doughty, 1997;1998). However, a direct association between corneal epithelial cell differentiation and LDH expression has not been demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%