2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(02)00149-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal–ceramic interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
187
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 459 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
187
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thus recommend adjusting the shape of the CZM laws to conform to the behaviour of the thin material strip or interface they are simulating. Developed CZM include triangular [17], linear-parabolic [18], polynomial [19], exponential [20] and trapezoidal laws [21]. Thus, CZM can also be adapted to simulate ductile adhesive layers, whose behaviour can be approximated with trapezoidal laws [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus recommend adjusting the shape of the CZM laws to conform to the behaviour of the thin material strip or interface they are simulating. Developed CZM include triangular [17], linear-parabolic [18], polynomial [19], exponential [20] and trapezoidal laws [21]. Thus, CZM can also be adapted to simulate ductile adhesive layers, whose behaviour can be approximated with trapezoidal laws [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, initiation, propagation, branching and coalescence of microcracks stem as an outcome of the simulation, without any a priori assumptions. Several cohesive laws have been proposed [54,55], but most popular are the potential-based laws by Tvergaard [56] and Xu and Needleman [57] and the linear laws by Camacho and Ortiz [58] and Ortiz and Pandolfi [59]. Cohesive FE models for 2D microstructures have been presented by several authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more brittle decohesion relations, as shown for instance in the right part of Figure 2 (i.e. when the decohesion law stems from micro-cracking as in concrete or ceramics), the shape of the stress-separation relation plays a much bigger role and is sometimes even more important than the value of the tensile strength f t [9,10]. …”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the partitionof-unity property of finite element shape functions can be used in a straightforward fashion to incorporate discontinuities, and thus, cohesive-zone models in a manner that preserves their truly discontinuous character. Indeed, in conventional finite element notation, the displacement field of an element that contains a single discontinuity can be represented as (10) where N contains the standard shape functions, andā andã collect the conventional and the additional nodal degrees-of-freedom, respectively. The numerical development now follows standard lines by casting the balance of momentum in a weak format, and, in the spirit of a standard Bubnov-Galerkin method, taking a decomposition as in Equation (9) also for the test function.…”
Section: Exact Numerical Representation Of Discontinuitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%