1986
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9525(86)90271-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some evolutionary consequences of the molecular recombination process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resistance is more likely to develop owing to emigration (gene flow) from pre-existing resistant populations (Pasteur & Raymond 1996;Futuyma 1998). Between-population gene flow and the resulting recombination, which increases genetic variation, are considered to be primary mechanisms for the development and spread of chemical resistance in wild populations (Leslie & Watt 1986). Recombination is also more frequent, thus, more likely, than de novo point mutation: King & Jukes (1969) estimated the substitution (mutation) rate at between 10 28 and 10 29 per codon per generation, whereas the crossing-over frequency (recombination) between two existing mutations in acetylcholine esterase has been shown to reach 10 25 (in Drosophila; Nagoshi & Gelbart 1987).…”
Section: The Genetic Basis For Chemical Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance is more likely to develop owing to emigration (gene flow) from pre-existing resistant populations (Pasteur & Raymond 1996;Futuyma 1998). Between-population gene flow and the resulting recombination, which increases genetic variation, are considered to be primary mechanisms for the development and spread of chemical resistance in wild populations (Leslie & Watt 1986). Recombination is also more frequent, thus, more likely, than de novo point mutation: King & Jukes (1969) estimated the substitution (mutation) rate at between 10 28 and 10 29 per codon per generation, whereas the crossing-over frequency (recombination) between two existing mutations in acetylcholine esterase has been shown to reach 10 25 (in Drosophila; Nagoshi & Gelbart 1987).…”
Section: The Genetic Basis For Chemical Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intragenic recombination is thought to have important consequences for population and evolutionary genetics, mainly by increasing the number and frequency of different alleles (26). Although there is no evidence for a strict relationship between resistance and fitness cost, the insecticides Finally, the existence of several point mutations and the occurrence of intracistronic recombinations between the mutations have practical consequences in resistance-management programs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%