1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb03831.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Empirical Tests of the Theory of Arbitrage Pricing

Abstract: We estimate the parameters of Ross's Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT). Using daily return data during the 1963–78 period, we compare the evidence on the APT and the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) as implemented by market indices and find that the APT performs well. The theory is further supported in that estimated expected returns depend on estimated factor loadings, and variables such as own variance and firm size do not contribute additional explanatory power to that of the factor loadings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
93
1
15

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
93
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Abeysekera and Mahajan (1987, p. 388) did not obtain any significant risk premium when testing the APT model in the London Stock Market. However, Chen (1983Chen ( , p. 1393Chen ( ,1397 gave evidence of the APT model and opposed to Reinganum (1981)'s proposal, verifying that in the USA market the APT model remains strong to inclusion of firm size and own variance, as these two variables did not show additional explanatory value. Besides, Bower et al (1984Bower et al ( , p. 1041 have observe in the same market that the APT model offers a better sign of risk and also better estimates of the expected return than a single-factor model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Likewise, Abeysekera and Mahajan (1987, p. 388) did not obtain any significant risk premium when testing the APT model in the London Stock Market. However, Chen (1983Chen ( , p. 1393Chen ( ,1397 gave evidence of the APT model and opposed to Reinganum (1981)'s proposal, verifying that in the USA market the APT model remains strong to inclusion of firm size and own variance, as these two variables did not show additional explanatory value. Besides, Bower et al (1984Bower et al ( , p. 1041 have observe in the same market that the APT model offers a better sign of risk and also better estimates of the expected return than a single-factor model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a pioneering work in the area, Chen (1983) gave an economic interpretation to statistical factors. In their popular work, Chen, Roll and Ross (1986) use a six factor model based on monthly data for the period of 1953-1983 and found industrial production, risk premium and term structure premium as the significant determinants of stock returns in U.S market.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…El pri me ro es el aná li sis fac to rial, que bus ca de ter mi nar coe fi cien tes de sen si ti vi dad (Fac tor Loa dings); 3 és te con sis te en un aná li sis al go rít -mi co de la ma triz es ti ma da de co va rian za de tí tu los (véa se Roll y Ross, 1980;Chen, 1983; Leh man y Mo dest, 1988). Los otros mé to dos son el de va ria bles ma croe co nó mi cas, en las que el in ves ti ga dor, ba sa do úni ca men te en su jui cio, es co ge fac to res, 4 pa ra lue go es ti mar los coefi cien tes de sen si ti vi dad y ve ri fi car si ellos ex pli can el cor te trans -…”
Section: Introductionunclassified