1991
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(91)90208-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some effects of surrounding forest canopy architecture on the wind field in small clearings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a wide forest shelterbelt, horizontal and vertical stand structures, described by the amount and distribution of trees in the shelterbelt, are proven to affect both the porosity (Zhu et al 2003b) and wind profile (Miller et al 1991;Mercer 2009). However, simple structural indices that are closely related to wind speed reduction efficiency have not been well identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a wide forest shelterbelt, horizontal and vertical stand structures, described by the amount and distribution of trees in the shelterbelt, are proven to affect both the porosity (Zhu et al 2003b) and wind profile (Miller et al 1991;Mercer 2009). However, simple structural indices that are closely related to wind speed reduction efficiency have not been well identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of these changes, forest remnants are exposed to increased wind speed, turbulence and vorticity (Bergen 1985;Miller et al 1991). Winds striking an abrupt forest edge can exert strong lateral-shear forces on exposed trees and create considerable downwind turbulence for at least 2-10 times the height of the forest edge (Somerville 1980;Savill 1983).…”
Section: Wind and Fragmented Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the edges of habitat remnants are exposed to increase wind speed, turbulence and vorticity (Bergen 1985;Miller et al 1991). Wind disturbance is an important ecological force in the tropics, especially in the cyclonic and hurricane zones from ca.…”
Section: Microclimate and Windmentioning
confidence: 99%