1128to have the effect of re-directing any channeled solvent streams over a broader front.Eleven samples of 5 g each were weighed out for determinations by Soxhlet traction with ether for 4 hr and a f urther 44 sampl of 2 g each for the modified column-and-tray method. The results obtained are listed in Table I. There is somewhat more spread in the results obtained by the column-and-tray method than in those from the Soxhlet method, but the results are considered to be sufficiently accurate and reliable for use as a rapid routine control method for determination of residual grease on scoured mohair. , ' Literature Cited 1. Dickinson, Dear Sir:There is still no unanimity on the cause of crimp in wool. The most widely held view is that it results from the unequal contraction of the bilateral segments of the fiber during the final stages of keratinization [2,3,10,12,13]. It has also been suggested [1] that it is a growth phenomenon caused by the rhythmical cycle of muscular contraction. This latter concept has also been used to explain certain aspects of the morphology of . &dquo;doggy wool&dquo; [ 11 ] . ' Snyman [16] made a useful contribution in support of the first theory of crimp formation when, in comparing wool fibers of equal diameter, he found that the greater the crimping rate of a fiber, the greater its content of sulfur and para cortex. The present communication extends this by showing that the increased critvping rate of high-sulfur wools is associated with an increased content of high-sulfur proteins and speci6cally with an increase in those protein components which are richest in sulfur. The low-sulfur proteins on the other hand ap-' pear to be identical in composition.Pairs of Merino wools were selected, such that each member of a pair had about the same diameter but a differing crimping rate. The wools were de-tipped, solvent scoured and solubilized by an extraction with urea-thioglycollate [9]. The soluble proteins, accounting for about 90% of the fiber, were converted to S-carboxymethyl kerateines by reaction with iodoacetate and fractionated into high and low-sulfur fractions by precipitation of the latter at pH 4.4. [5]. The results shown in Table I indicate that the high crimping wools contain the most high-sulfur protein.High-sulfur protein from each wool was run electrophoretically at pH 4.4 in acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer of ionic strength 0.1 and it was found (Fig. 1) that each pair of proteins contained the same sort of components but in differing amounts. The proportion of these components was determined by measuring the rela-tive areas under each region of the electrophoretic patterns of Fig 1. By combining this data with the relevant data in .column 4 of Table I, the amount (g/100g) in wool of each of these components was computed (Table I ). It is apparent that both low and high crimping 1 7