2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219243
View full text | Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: In this paper, we explore the (in)efficiency of the continuum Bitcoin-USD market in the period ranging from mid 2010 to early 2019. To deal with, we dynamically analyse the evolution of the self-similarity exponent of Bitcoin-USD daily returns via accurate FD4 approach by a 512 day sliding window with overlapping data. Further, we define the memory indicator by the difference between the self-similarity exponent of Bitcoin-USD series and the self-similarity index of its shuffled series. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And later, Baur et al, Kapar et al and Fassas et al [ 27 29 ] provided empirical evidence on the linkages between Bitcoin spot and futures. Dimitrova et al [ 30 ] investigated the efficiency of the Bitcoin market and pointed out the existence of anti-persistent memory in the BTC-USD series. A recent study done by Nikolova et al [ 31 ] further pointed out that the volatility in cryptocurrencies changed faster than in traditional assets, and much faster than in forex pairs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And later, Baur et al, Kapar et al and Fassas et al [ 27 29 ] provided empirical evidence on the linkages between Bitcoin spot and futures. Dimitrova et al [ 30 ] investigated the efficiency of the Bitcoin market and pointed out the existence of anti-persistent memory in the BTC-USD series. A recent study done by Nikolova et al [ 31 ] further pointed out that the volatility in cryptocurrencies changed faster than in traditional assets, and much faster than in forex pairs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that the past values of the variance of cryptocurrencies have the greatest effect on the current variance, and that cryptocurrencies have an exploding variance forecast. Recently, Nikolova, Trinidad Segovia, Fernández-Martínez & Sánchez-Granero [ 12 ] and Dimitrova, Fernández-Martinez, Sánchez-Granero & Trinidad Segovia [ 13 ] analyzed the bitcoin stylized facts related to volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the authors analyzed the Bitcoin market efficiency by applying different approaches, including the Hurst exponent (cf. [30] for a detailed review), whereas others investigated its volatility using other methods. For instance, Letra [31] used a GARCH model for Bitcoin daily data; Bouoiyour and Selmi [32] carried out many extensions of GARCH models to estimate Bitcoin price dynamics; Bouri, Azzi, and Dyhberg [33] analyzed the relation between volatility changes and price returns of Bitcoin based on an asymmetric GARCH model; Balcilar et al [34] analyzed the relation between the trading volume of Bitcoin and its returns and volatility by employing, in contrast, a non-parametric causality in quantiles test; and Baur et al [35] studied the statistical properties of Bitcoin and its relations with traditional asset classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%