1986
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4686(86)87089-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some aspects of the electrochemical behaviour of mild steel in carbonate/bicarbonate solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…several µm/year) and in good agreement with short term corrosion experiments made in laboratory to simulate the corrosion mechanisms (Schlegel et al 2008(Schlegel et al , 2014. Besides, electrochemical measurements made by impedance spectroscopy during short term laboratory experiments suggested that the mere presence of the carbonate thick layer was not sufficient to explain the low corrosion rates (because of their relatively high porosity), but that a dense and barrier layer should be present at the interface between the metal and the carbonated corrosion products (Rangel et al 1986;Castro et al 1991;Bataillon et al 2001;Han et al 2009). To verify this assertion the metal/corrosion product interface of some archaeological artefacts was studied at the nanometric scale by a combination of TEM and Scanning Transmission X ray Microscope (STXM) observations performed on a thin film sample obtained by Focused Ion Beam (FIB) at the metal/corrosion product interface.…”
Section: Ferrous Alloyssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…several µm/year) and in good agreement with short term corrosion experiments made in laboratory to simulate the corrosion mechanisms (Schlegel et al 2008(Schlegel et al , 2014. Besides, electrochemical measurements made by impedance spectroscopy during short term laboratory experiments suggested that the mere presence of the carbonate thick layer was not sufficient to explain the low corrosion rates (because of their relatively high porosity), but that a dense and barrier layer should be present at the interface between the metal and the carbonated corrosion products (Rangel et al 1986;Castro et al 1991;Bataillon et al 2001;Han et al 2009). To verify this assertion the metal/corrosion product interface of some archaeological artefacts was studied at the nanometric scale by a combination of TEM and Scanning Transmission X ray Microscope (STXM) observations performed on a thin film sample obtained by Focused Ion Beam (FIB) at the metal/corrosion product interface.…”
Section: Ferrous Alloyssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Many investigations were carried out using highly alkaline solutions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] or using buffer solutions as carbonate/bicarbonate [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] or borate buffer [27][28][29][30][31][32] when a constant and not very high pH is desirable. Many products have been identified as resulting from the anodic polarization of iron at different potentials, by different surface analysis techniques [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]22,26,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as under anodic polarization kinetics should also be considered, peak A could be related with the oxidation of the Fe(II) into Fe(III) species and peak A′ (−0.87 V vs . SHE) probably due to the reduction of Fe (III) oxide/hydroxide to Fe (II) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%