1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00321421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some aspects of the charging effect in monochromatized focused XPS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the spectra are complicated by differential charging effects which result in a doubling of some of the peaks, the only two peaks observed are associated with SiO 2 and Li x Si. 28,35 As expected the peak associated with the Li x Si becomes dominant at the greatest depth of penetration. After 5 cycles differences are observed for the FEC electrolyte, especially at the greater depths of penetration.…”
Section: Electrochemical Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…While the spectra are complicated by differential charging effects which result in a doubling of some of the peaks, the only two peaks observed are associated with SiO 2 and Li x Si. 28,35 As expected the peak associated with the Li x Si becomes dominant at the greatest depth of penetration. After 5 cycles differences are observed for the FEC electrolyte, especially at the greater depths of penetration.…”
Section: Electrochemical Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As described, most methods use charged particles (ions, electrons) as a probe (primary beam), but also the secondary beam can consist of charged species. Both can induce charging effects on non-conductive materials, which often leads to errors in the measured data and to misinterpretations, especially in electron spectroscopy [12].…”
Section: Problem-oriented Use Of Microanalytical Techniques For Defecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between Eb and P is expressed as Eq. (6). By using this equation one can estimate the binding energy (Eb) where charge-up doesn't occur.…”
Section: Determination C F the Spectrometer Work Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, E° represents the binding energy where the X-ray power is equal to zero, i.e., the magnitude of the chargeup is equal to zero. If U is identical to the charge-up potential, the apparent binding energy (Eb) is written by Eb=Eb+U = Eb + aP/(bP + c) (6) as a possible form to describe the variation of the apparent binding energy with the X-ray power. If this expression is in fact applicable, one could possibly use it to extrapolate to P=0 to obtain the value of Ee, which is the charge-free measured binding energy for insulating samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%