1991
DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(91)90003-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some aspects of parallel and distributed iterative algorithms—A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
610
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(655 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
610
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most famous one is the successive projection method for polyhedral sets known as the Agmon-MotzkinSchoenberg algorithm [Agm54,MoS54]. Further examples can be found in the excellent surveys in [BeT89,BaB96,CeZ97]. Such methods can also in some cases be interpreted as subgradient methods for the minimization of a non-differentiable convex function over a closed convex set (e.g., [Gof78]), several methods for which also use projections onto level sets of convex functions or surrogate linearized subgradient inequalities (as in "poor man's bundle methods"); see, for example, the level methods in [LNN95,Kiw96a,Kiw96b], references found therein, and [Bra93, pp.…”
Section: Euclidean Projectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most famous one is the successive projection method for polyhedral sets known as the Agmon-MotzkinSchoenberg algorithm [Agm54,MoS54]. Further examples can be found in the excellent surveys in [BeT89,BaB96,CeZ97]. Such methods can also in some cases be interpreted as subgradient methods for the minimization of a non-differentiable convex function over a closed convex set (e.g., [Gof78]), several methods for which also use projections onto level sets of convex functions or surrogate linearized subgradient inequalities (as in "poor man's bundle methods"); see, for example, the level methods in [LNN95,Kiw96a,Kiw96b], references found therein, and [Bra93, pp.…”
Section: Euclidean Projectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of dealing with nonsmoothness. The nice effect of the regularization on the decentralization of subproblems in the décomposition of large-scale programs (see [2], [10] and [15]). …”
Section: (X = U N )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sensé, it can be compared to similar approaches given in Bertsekas et aL [2] and in Spingarn [19]. Numerical experiments on these methods for the décomposition of large-scale convex programs will be published elsewhere.…”
Section: Application To the Decomposition Of Convex Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest communication task involving broadcasting is the single node broadcast, where exactly one of the nodes wishes to broadcast a packet; see [BeT89]. This task can be accomplished in d time units, by using a spanning tree with shortest paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single node broadcast is an extreme case of the problem analyzed in this note, corresponding to K = 1. The other extreme case, namely K = 2 d , corresponds to the multinode broadcast task, where all nodes wish to perform a broadcast at the same time; see (BeT89]. The minimum possible time for this task (in the dcube) is [2 -1] and it is attained by an algorithm by Bertsekas et al [BOSTT89].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%