Some Aspects of Nato Standards Implementation in the Armament and Military Equipment Testing System of Ukraine

Abstract

The world practice of creating and modernizing specimens of armament and military equipment envisages carrying out numerous tests, checks and evaluations of the current technical conditions throughout the life cycle. This leads to the need for improvement of the test system, the regulatory framework of which is a system of standards. Updating the standards that regulate preparation and testing of new and modernized specimens of armament and military equipment, based on best international and domestic experience, at the moment is actual and perspective development direction of the standardization system in the sphere of defence.
 The purpose of the article is to analyze the ways of implementing NATO standards and determine the feasibility of their application “by the method of confirmation” in the armament and military equipment testing system.
 During the research general scientific methods of processing and systematization of information, in particular system analysis and synthesis of organizational and technical systems, were applied.
 The current state of the system of standardization of armament and military equipment in Ukraine was analyzed. It was determined that at present the military standardization system in the Ministry of Defence and the Armed Forces of Ukraine practically corresponds to the standardization system of NATO.
 It was established that one of the main tasks of military standardization is the transition to European and NATO standards. Analysis of these normative documents has revealed that the main requirements are consistent through the identity of standards, as well as through the adoption of national standards by the “method of confirmation”.
 A comparative analysis of NATO standards STANAG 4370 and military standards ГОСТ В revealed the presence of significant differences in the classification of military equipment, the requirements for stability, sustainability and durability to the influence of external factors. It was noted that in Ukraine there is lack of practice of dissemination and use of the normative documents in English adopted by the “method of confirmation”; there is also a shortage of qualified specialists on standardization with a sufficient language competence, as well as lack of common research vocabulary in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, harmonized with national and international terminological systems.
 It was established that for the development of standardization system of armament and military equipment, in particular for conducting tests, it is recommended to use NATO standards as an information base, taking into account the domestic experience of the standardization system in developing requirements for reliability and stability to the influence of external factors. It was recommended to carry out the introduction of NATO standards by method of reissue (adaptation, translation) with the assistance of Ukrainian specialists on military standardization.

Legislative Provision of Standardisation of Armaments and Military Equipment Development: International Aspect

“…The input data for this study were information obtained from scientific papers (Johannes, 2018;King, 2010;Lappo et al, 2020) and articles (Eurolab, 2017; European Union Institute for Security Search, 2018; Ukrinform, 2021). In this case, the main empirical background of the study is collected using four methods: direct observation, comparison, monitoring and analysis of the documents, which ensure the standardisation of armament and military equipment at the state and interstate levels.…”

“…As a result of the practice, the period of updating (glancing) of the standards in the middle warehouse is 5 years. For the rest of the rock, there have been changes in the minds of the growth of intelligence in military equipment, the accumulation of significant information about the robots with the existing system of standards in defense halls, the meaning of the changes and inadequacies of the new generation of standards (Lappo et al, 2020).…”

“…The success of the development of new technologies and AME is closely linked to the full cycle of theoretical and practical research, laboratory, and field tests. This, in turn, requires the creation or modernisation of appropriate material and technical resources as well as testing facilities, bringing it to the current technical level, which requires significant financial and material costs (Lappo et al, 2020).…”