1968
DOI: 10.2514/3.4438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some aspects of cylindrical shell panel flutter.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the further increasing the pressure, the shell loses stability by coupled-mode flutter once the imaginary part of complex frequency crosses the zero value. Prediction of critical freestream static pressure by using equation (12) is closer to the experimental results than evaluating pressure field by equation (13). The complex frequencies for the case that aerodynamic pressure is evaluated using equation (13) are plotted in fig.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the further increasing the pressure, the shell loses stability by coupled-mode flutter once the imaginary part of complex frequency crosses the zero value. Prediction of critical freestream static pressure by using equation (12) is closer to the experimental results than evaluating pressure field by equation (13). The complex frequencies for the case that aerodynamic pressure is evaluated using equation (13) are plotted in fig.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complete description of panel flutter modeling is given in his book [2]. A study by Carter and Stearman [9] showed that agreement between the theory and experiments reported in the literature exists in cases that involve a small amount of static preload acting on the shell. Amabili and Pellicano [10] included geometric nonlinearities in their study of the supersonic flutter of a circular cylindrical shell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For this case, the finer mesh is chosen for the zones close to the fluid free surface and clamped boundary condition, and the converged results are obtained by n x = 12 and n y = 88. It is important to note that several studies, such as the study conducted by Carter and Stearman, 6 considered different values for L = 16 in (0.406 m), E = 13 × 10 6 psi (8.96 × 10 10 N/m 2 ), and = 0.33. As mentioned by Sabri and Lakis, 13 the former is referred to as Case I, and the latter is called Case II.…”
Section: Vibration Analysis Of a Partially Liquid-filled Circular Cylmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 To capture the circumferentially traveling wave flutter mode observed during the experimental test, Evensen and Olson 1,5 conducted a study by including geometric nonlinearities in the theoretical model by applying a four-mode expansion for the shell deflection. In a work that aimed to account for the discrepancies between theory and experiment observations reported in the literature, Carter and Stearman 6 found that a preflutter configuration did not notably influence the flutter boundary. It was also found that the agreement between theory and experiment existed only for a small amount of static preload.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%