1997
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Archaeological Applications of Kernel Density Estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
12

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
90
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, an outer border of dense site distribution was determined using the criterion of the maximal increase of space (Zimmermann et al 2004: 53-54). The alternative is to use kernel density estimation (Baxter et al 1974). The problem here is to derive a reliable bandwidth and to obtain a reasonable outer border.…”
Section: Methodological Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, an outer border of dense site distribution was determined using the criterion of the maximal increase of space (Zimmermann et al 2004: 53-54). The alternative is to use kernel density estimation (Baxter et al 1974). The problem here is to derive a reliable bandwidth and to obtain a reasonable outer border.…”
Section: Methodological Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B) was performed on each row of C in equation 2, C i , by first calculating a histogram, using 100 equally spaced bins, of scalp voltages from that channel. This histogram was then convolved (smoothed) with a Gaussian function (Baxter et al 1997) whose standard deviation was, 1.0592* n* s 71/5 where n was the number of time points in the epoch, and s the standard deviation of the values recorded from the i th channel during the epoch, i.e. C i (Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority are focused on either spatial versions of well-known summary statistics (mean centre of distribution, standard distance; Mitchell, 2005) or the assessment of first order properties (kernel density estimates; Baxter et al, 1997). There are a number of alternative tools aimed at assessing second order properties, and capable of integrating weighted values such as weighted K functions (Getis, 1984) and pair correlation functions (Gavrikov and Stoyan, 1995).…”
Section: An Uncertainty-weighting Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%