2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8458-6_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Applications of the Malliavin Calculus to Sub-Gaussian and Non-Sub-Gaussian Random Fields

Abstract: We introduce a boundedness condition on the Malliavin derivative of a random variable to study subGaussian and other non-Gaussian properties of functionals of random …elds, with particular attention to the estimation of suprema. We relate the boundedness of nth Malliavin derivatives to a new class of "sub-nth Gaussian chaos" processes. An expected supremum estimation, extending the DudleyFernique theorem, is proved for such processes. Sub-nth Gaussian chaos concentration inequalities for the supremum are obtai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the proof in [17] completely generalized the standard Borell-Sudakov inequality to the sub-Gaussian and sub-2nd-chaos cases, it ran into inefficiencies in the case of higher order chaos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While the proof in [17] completely generalized the standard Borell-Sudakov inequality to the sub-Gaussian and sub-2nd-chaos cases, it ran into inefficiencies in the case of higher order chaos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Also in [17], using a new concise Malliavin-derivative-based proof, a Borell-Sudakov 2 -type concentration inequality for such processes was proved, which shows that the supremum of a sub-nth chaos process is again a sub-nth chaos random variable with a well-controlled scale. While the proof in [17] completely generalized the standard Borell-Sudakov inequality to the sub-Gaussian and sub-2nd-chaos cases, it ran into inefficiencies in the case of higher order chaos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations