2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2007.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supremum concentration inequality and modulus of continuity for sub-nth chaos processes

Abstract: This article provides a detailed analysis of the behavior of suprema and moduli of continuity for a large class of random fields which generalize Gaussian processes, sub-Gaussian processes, and random fields that are in the nth chaos of a Wiener process. An upper bound of Dudley type on the tail of the random field's supremum is derived using a generic chaining argument; it implies similar results for the expected supremum, and for the field's modulus of continuity. We also utilize a sharp and convenient condi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the upper bound portion of our work (Section 4.1), and closer yet to the rst-chaos portion of the work in [16]; they do not, however, address lower bound issues.…”
Section: Concentration Inequalitiessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This is similar to the upper bound portion of our work (Section 4.1), and closer yet to the rst-chaos portion of the work in [16]; they do not, however, address lower bound issues.…”
Section: Concentration Inequalitiessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…(1.4) The modulus of continuity for X H,N (ω) obtained thanks to [33] allows to derive, for almost all ω ∈ Ω, that lim sup…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader will check that the first of the following two corollaries is trivial to prove using the tools in this article. The second corollary requires techniques in [12], and can also be proved directly by using sub-Gaussian concentration results (see [27]). We do not give any details of its proof, for the sake of conciseness.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%