1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00506.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some advances in endosseous implants

Abstract: A major advance in endosseous implantology hinges on the coating of titanium implants by porous biodegradable, bioreactive tricalcium phosphate ceramic. When implanted into alveolar bone by a careful technique, the ceramic is resorbed to be replaced by bone. As a result, the endosseous implant becomes ankylosed to the bone. This represents a stable implant/bone interface as opposed to the unstable connective tissue interface that encapsulates many other implant devices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Osseointegration is the essential and pivotal requirement for the long‐term success of the implant to maintaining the mechanical stability with the surrounding bone tissue. Previous researches 26,27 have demonstrated that pure Ti implant may sometimes lead to the direct bonding to the bone tissue through its native oxide surface under press‐fit condition. However, in our study, the implant surface of Ti alloy was in poor contact with bone tissue, and a typical layer of fibrous tissue was always emerging at the interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osseointegration is the essential and pivotal requirement for the long‐term success of the implant to maintaining the mechanical stability with the surrounding bone tissue. Previous researches 26,27 have demonstrated that pure Ti implant may sometimes lead to the direct bonding to the bone tissue through its native oxide surface under press‐fit condition. However, in our study, the implant surface of Ti alloy was in poor contact with bone tissue, and a typical layer of fibrous tissue was always emerging at the interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Montes considered that living and functional bone tissue formation around the implants results in osseointegration [25,28]. Success of osseointegration depends on certain factors [33], such as implant biomaterial and superficial properties (topography and surface roughness) [4,10,11,18,19,22], appropriate bone quantity and quality [15], systemic factors and no surgical complications, such as bone overheating and contamination [4,24], and peri-implantitis [32,36]. In our study, osseointegration of all cases was attained from the clinical aspect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work from the late 1970s to early 1990s proved HD formation was dependent on implant bulk material, smooth surfaces promoted HD formation compared to rough surfaces, and adsorbed protein content controlled HD formation (a detailed history of these early studies may be found elsewhere.) [ [387] , [388] , [389] , [390] , [391] , [392] , [393] , [394] , [395] ] Parallel observations were being made from groups investigating implant osseointegration; osseointegration was dependent on implant material, rougher surfaces promoted osseointegration, and adsorbed protein content controlled osseointegration [ [396] , [397] , [398] , [399] , [400] , [401] , [402] ]. Since then, only a handful of studies have confirmed that physicochemistry and topography control HD in vitro [ 403 ] and in rat models [ 384 , [404] , [405] , [406] ], and specifically that HD formation (in rats at least) is generally higher on zirconia than titanium [ [407] , [408] , [409] ].…”
Section: Peri-implant Junctional Epitheliummentioning
confidence: 99%