1994
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800810925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatostatin receptor-dependent growth inhibition of liver metastases by octreotide

Abstract: Rats were administered the somatostatin analogue octreotide 15 micrograms intraperitoneally twice daily for 4 weeks after intraportal injection of somatostatin receptor-positive pancreatic tumour cells (CA-20948) and somatostatin receptor-negative colonic tumour cells (CC531). Octreotide significantly inhibited the growth and development of somatostatin receptor-positive tumour cells in the liver. The median number of liver tumours was 286 (range 146 to greater than 500) in the treated animals and more than 50… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, other antitumor modalities such as hepatic embolization, chemoembolization, or treatment with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues have not been clearly shown to improve survival by inhibiting tumor growth in patients with malignant PETs 10, 40. Third, numerous studies have demonstrated that somatostatin analogues can inhibit the growth of NETs in animal studies 18, 45. Furthermore, a number of studies have demonstrated that treatment with somatostatin analogues has an antitumor growth effect in patients with malignant gastrointestinal NETs (i.e., carcinoids or PETs), resulting in stabilization of the tumor growth in 37–80% of patients to the point that no additional growth occurred (i.e., tumoristatic effect) as well as a decrease in tumor size in 0–17% of patients (i.e., tumoricidal effect) 18, 26, 40, 46–49.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, other antitumor modalities such as hepatic embolization, chemoembolization, or treatment with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues have not been clearly shown to improve survival by inhibiting tumor growth in patients with malignant PETs 10, 40. Third, numerous studies have demonstrated that somatostatin analogues can inhibit the growth of NETs in animal studies 18, 45. Furthermore, a number of studies have demonstrated that treatment with somatostatin analogues has an antitumor growth effect in patients with malignant gastrointestinal NETs (i.e., carcinoids or PETs), resulting in stabilization of the tumor growth in 37–80% of patients to the point that no additional growth occurred (i.e., tumoristatic effect) as well as a decrease in tumor size in 0–17% of patients (i.e., tumoricidal effect) 18, 26, 40, 46–49.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Somatostatin also exerts an inhibitory effect on DNA synthesis in tumor cells. And (4) Furthermore, somatostatin analogues can also inhibit the angiogenesis of neoplasm [6][7][8] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiment E: 2 groups of 3 male WAGRIJ rats inoculated with CC531 colon-carcinoma cells in the vena porta (Van Eijck et al, 1994) and 2 groups of 3 male Lewis rats inoculated with CA20948 pancreatic-tumour cells in the hindleg (Bakker et al, 1991b) were injected with 2 MBq (0.1 µg) [ 111 In-DTPA-Pro 1 ,Tyr 4 ]BN with or without 100 µg [Tyr 4 ]BN. Tissue distribution was determined after 24 hr.…”
Section: Experimental Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%