1981
DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(81)90494-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatostatin 28: Comparison with somatostatin 14 for plasma kinetics and low-dose effects on the exocrine pancreas in dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The infused S-14 disappeared with a half-life of 1 06+ 019 min; similar results have been reported by others working without plasma extraction in dogs (Schusdziarra, Harris, & Unger, 1979;Vaysse et al 1981) and man (Sheppard, Shapiro, Pimstone et al 1979) and with extraction in pigs (Hilsted & Hoist, 1982) and man (Bethge, Diel, Rosick & Holz, 1981). The half-life for S-28 (2-14+ 0-54min) was remarkably close to that obtained in dogs (Vaysse et al 1981;Polonsky et al 1982;Seal et al 1982) but considerably longer than that obtained by Patel & Wheatley (1983) in rats (1-35 min). This discrepancy may result from a true species difference in the clearance of S-28, or from the assay procedure as well as the use of the constant infusion technique in man, dogs and ducks, compared with a single injection method in rats (Patel &Wheatley, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The infused S-14 disappeared with a half-life of 1 06+ 019 min; similar results have been reported by others working without plasma extraction in dogs (Schusdziarra, Harris, & Unger, 1979;Vaysse et al 1981) and man (Sheppard, Shapiro, Pimstone et al 1979) and with extraction in pigs (Hilsted & Hoist, 1982) and man (Bethge, Diel, Rosick & Holz, 1981). The half-life for S-28 (2-14+ 0-54min) was remarkably close to that obtained in dogs (Vaysse et al 1981;Polonsky et al 1982;Seal et al 1982) but considerably longer than that obtained by Patel & Wheatley (1983) in rats (1-35 min). This discrepancy may result from a true species difference in the clearance of S-28, or from the assay procedure as well as the use of the constant infusion technique in man, dogs and ducks, compared with a single injection method in rats (Patel &Wheatley, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…(S-28), a naturally occurring TVterminal extended form of the tetradecapeptide S-14 isolated from porcine intestine (Pradayrol, Jornvall, Mutt & Ribet, 1980), is more potent than the tetra¬ decapeptide for inhibition of pituitary secretion (Susini, Esteve & Vaysse, 1980;Brazeau, Ling, Esch et al 1981) and insulin and glucagon release (Tannenbaum, Ung & Brazeau, 1982). These effects could be due to a slower catabolism of this form in plasma (Vaysse, Chayvialle, Pradayrol et al 1981;Seal, Yamada, Debas et al 1982;Patel & Wheatley, 1983) and/or at the tissue level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, in dogs (Vaysse et al 1981a;Konturek et al 1981) the peptides are reported to have a similar effect in suppressing insulin secretion. The greater activity of SS-28 may be due to the higher steady state levels achieved after continuous infusion as demonstrated by the present study and in dogs (Vaysse et al 1981b). However, SS-28 may also have a greater intrinsic affinity for binding the human ß cell somatostatin receptor as has been shown in rat insulinoma cells (Brown et al 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…All tests were performed after an overnight fast and after withdrawal of any antisecretory medication for at least 5 days before the study. In tests with cephalic-phase stimulation, a double-lumen Dreiling tube was passed under fluoroscopic control for gastric juice collection as described previously (12). Residual gastric contents were discarded, and the gastric aspirates were collected with a suction pump in 15-min periods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It showed that SS-28 mimics most of the gastrointestinal secretory effects of SS-14 (10) but results in higher immunoreactive somatostatin plasma levels, probably due to the slower meta-bolic rate of SS-28 in plasma and in other tissues In this study, performed in healthy subjects, we compared both the effects of cephalic-and gastrointestinal-phase stimulation on somatostatin-like immunoreactivity (SLI) plasma levels and the actions of exogenous SS-14 and SS-28 on gastric secretion and plasma hormonal responses to these stimulations. (11,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%