Somatosensory event-related potential and autonomic activity to varying pain reduction cognitive strategies in hypnosis

Pascalis, Vilfredo De; Magurano, Maria Rosaria; Bellusci, Anna; Chen, Andrew C. N.

doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00586-7

Cited by 62 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…DePascalis et al, 2001). In contrast, non-hypnotic studies generally report a P2 component to electroshock (Bromm and Lorenz, 1998).…”

Section: Principal Component Analysis Of the Mnementioning

confidence: 98%

“…In general, such attentional effects are assumed to be based on afferent activity of an attentional control network that includes deep structures such as the anterior cingulate (Carter et al, 1999), and posterior parietal as well as prefrontal neocortical areas (Corbetta, 1998;Desimone and Duncan, 1995). Future work may try to shed light on these questions by obtaining correlates of emotional state such as subjective ratings, skin conductance or facial EMG data, an approach recently initiated by DePascalis et al (2001).…”

Section: Principal Component Analysis Of the Mnementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

High resolution EEG indicators of pain responses in relation to hypnotic susceptibility and suggestion

Ray

Keil

Mikuteit

et al. 2002

Biological Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this report we use a dense array (129 electrodes) EEG procedure to examine the effects of hypnotic susceptibility and hypnotic suggestions on electrocortical and self-report measures of painful stimuli. Self-report and event-related potential measures of six high and six low hypnotic susceptible individuals in response to pain were examined during an initial baseline condition and following a standard hypnotic induction under suggestions to either increase (hyperalgesia) or decrease (hypoalgesia) the painful stimulation. Our results show that high and low hypnotically susceptible individuals: (1) show few self-report or psychophysiological differences in response to baseline pain stimuli; (2) report differential pain experiences depending on hypnotic suggestions and (3) display differential psychophysiological indicators following an hypnotic induction with a suggestion of hypoalgesia. Overall, the findings suggest that hypnotic suggestions with high susceptible individuals modulate the later components of the evoked potential in a global manner and point up the importance of using both high and low hypnotically susceptible individuals preceding and following an hypnotic induction.

show abstract

“…DePascalis et al, 2001). In contrast, non-hypnotic studies generally report a P2 component to electroshock (Bromm and Lorenz, 1998).…”

Section: Principal Component Analysis Of the Mnementioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Principal Component Analysis Of the Mnementioning

confidence: 99%

High resolution EEG indicators of pain responses in relation to hypnotic susceptibility and suggestion

Ray

Keil

Mikuteit

et al. 2002

Biological Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Examples include hypnotic modulation of ERPs to visual (De Pascalis & Carboni, 1997;Jasiukaitis, Nouriani, & Spiegel, 1996;Spiegel, 1985;Spiegel & Barabasz, 1988), olfactory (Barabasz & Lonsdale, 1983), and somatosensory perceptual stimuli (De Pascalis, Magurano, & Bellusci, 1999;De Pascalis, Magurano, Bellusci, & Chen, 2001;Spiegel, Bierre, & Rootenberg, 1989).…”

Section: Event-related Potential Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Negative and Positive Visual Hypnotic Hallucinations: Attending Inside and Out

Spiegel

2003

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hypnotic perceptual alteration affects brain function. Those hypnotic instructions that reduce perception by creating an illusory obstruction to it reduce brain response to perception in the cognate sensory cortex, as measured by event-related potential (ERP) amplitude and regional blood flow (PET). Those hypnotic instructions that affect the subject's reaction to perception activate the anterior attentional system, especially the anterior cingulate cortex in PET studies. Hypnosis involves activation without arousal and may be particularly mediated via dopaminergic pathways. Hypnotic alteration of perception is accompanied by measurable changes in both perceptual and attentional function of those specific regions of the brain that process these activities, modulated by the nature of the specific hypnotic instruction. Positive obstructive hallucinations seem to allow for a hypnotic focus inward, activating the functioning of attentional neural systems and reducing perceptual ones.

show abstract

“…These for example include hypnotic visual hallucinations and analgesia (e.g. Crawford, Knebel, Kaplan, Ve ndenia, Xie, Jamison and Pribram, 1998;Wik, Fischer, Bragee, Finer and Frederikson, 1999;Faymonville, Laureys, Degueldre, Delfiore, Luxen, Franck, Lamy and Maquet, 2000;De Pascalis, Magurano, Bellusci and Chen, 2001;Rainville, Duncan and Price, 2002;Ray, Keil, Mikuteit, Bongartz and Elbert, 2002;Spiegel, 2003;Derbyshire, Whalley, Stenger and Oakley, 2004).…”

Section: Evidence For An Asc In Hypnosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Altered states of consciousness and hypnosis in the twenty-first century

Gruzelier

2005

Contemp. Hypnosis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The contemporary perspective on altered states of conscious is surveyed as an introduction to commentaries on Kallio and Revonsuo's lead article in Contemporary Hypnosis (2003). It is noted that the study of consciousness, unconscious processing, and altered states of consciousness are central issues in neuroscience, heralding fresh approaches to the neuroscientific understanding of hypnosis. These include attempts to bring together new neurophysiological methods with phenomenological report. The alteration in hypnosis of anterior brain processes including the anterior cingulated cortex and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex are particularly productive areas of research. The lack of engagement with neuroscientific evidence from theorists with a purely social and cognitive orientation to hypnosis is noted, with examples provided from research on attention and relaxation. Unifying the field awaits active collaboration between scientists with neurophysiological and social orientations.

show abstract

Somatosensory event-related potential and autonomic activity to varying pain reduction cognitive strategies in hypnosis

Cited by 62 publications

References 55 publications

High resolution EEG indicators of pain responses in relation to hypnotic susceptibility and suggestion

High resolution EEG indicators of pain responses in relation to hypnotic susceptibility and suggestion

Negative and Positive Visual Hypnotic Hallucinations: Attending Inside and Out

Altered states of consciousness and hypnosis in the twenty-first century

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About