1993
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880220044007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatic Gene Therapy: Methods for the Present and Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would provide a mechanism for single administration of a vector to achieve limited long term, steady levels of gene product using common routes of delivery. 26,27 To overcome the problems concerning RLN reinnervation failure, we have demonstrated the potential of gene therapy. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I gene transfer to denervated thyroarytenoid (TA) muscle has been shown to prevent muscle atrophy while improving motor endplate morphology in a rat laryngeal paralysis model, 28,29 and adenoviral vector-mediated GDNF gene transfer prevents motor neuron loss in the nucleus ambiguus in a rat vagal nerve avulsion model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would provide a mechanism for single administration of a vector to achieve limited long term, steady levels of gene product using common routes of delivery. 26,27 To overcome the problems concerning RLN reinnervation failure, we have demonstrated the potential of gene therapy. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I gene transfer to denervated thyroarytenoid (TA) muscle has been shown to prevent muscle atrophy while improving motor endplate morphology in a rat laryngeal paralysis model, 28,29 and adenoviral vector-mediated GDNF gene transfer prevents motor neuron loss in the nucleus ambiguus in a rat vagal nerve avulsion model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Gene therapy provides a mechanism whereby infrequent administration achieves long-term steady-state levels of the gene product using common routes of delivery. 11,12…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Given the short half-life of GDNF in vivo and rapid diffusion into adjacent tissues, hydrogel delivery allows GDNF to remain at the injury site during hydrogel degradation, whereas even high doses administered by bolus injection are quickly cleared or metabolized. 48 For example, while the burst release of $3 mg of GDNF from a hydrogel over the 1st day provides continuous dosing, a 5 mg bolus injection provides twice the dosage within minutes. Furthermore, bolus injection poses the risk of toxic side effects such as focal cell loss, pia thickening, Schwann cell hyperplasia, and ingrowth of sympathetic fibers resulting from a high dose of local delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, bolus injection poses the risk of toxic side effects such as focal cell loss, pia thickening, Schwann cell hyperplasia, and ingrowth of sympathetic fibers resulting from a high dose of local delivery. 38,48,49 Repeated administration of lower doses could replicate mechanical allodynia produced by the sustained delivery of a hydrogel or minipump. While repeated injections would more clearly define temporal profiles in vivo, the hydrogel delivery provides simplified treatment with alterable release kinetics eliminating multiple treatments or implantation of minipumps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%