Woody Plant Biotechnology 1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-7932-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somaclonal Variation in Populus Hybrids Regenerated from Protoplast Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar changes had also been observed by Serres et al (1991) in Populus hybrids regenerated from protoplast culture. Since no transformation was involved in this case, the assumption was that these were related to the in vitro culture manipulations necessary for the differentiation of transgenic plants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar changes had also been observed by Serres et al (1991) in Populus hybrids regenerated from protoplast culture. Since no transformation was involved in this case, the assumption was that these were related to the in vitro culture manipulations necessary for the differentiation of transgenic plants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Similar somaclonal variants were also regenerated by Serres et al (1991) from in vitro cultures of the same poplar clone without transformation.…”
Section: -8819 9 1996mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…As shown in Table 3 of our work, the same or even more differences of stem height and diameter were observed between somaclonal variants of adventive regenerants. Different growth rates of regenerants from protoplasts of poplar were also described in work of Serres et al [29]. It may be concluded that fast-growing woody plants may be obtained due to somaclonal variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Although the letters Rand SC, or just S (Fry et al, 1998), have been used by different investigators for primary in-vitro regenerants, there is a need to standardize the nomenclature in this field. In that event, I would suggest that we retain the R designation for the regenerants from the somatic cells following the microshootJroot plantlet pathway, and propose the term SR for the regenerants derived from somatic cells via somatic embryogenesis, and PR (protoplast regenerants, or protoclones (Serres et al, 1991; as the primary regenerants from the protoplasts. A simplified approach would be to designate somaclones derived from any type of tissue as SC or just S. On the other hand, it might be useful to approach the problem based on the tissue of origin.…”
Section: Designation Of Somaclonal Progenymentioning
confidence: 99%