2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2007.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving heterogeneous-agent models with parameterized cross-sectional distributions

Abstract: A new algorithm is developed to solve models with heterogeneous agents and aggregate uncertainty that avoids some disadvantages of the prevailing algorithm that strongly relies on simulation techniques and is easier to implement than existing algorithms. A key aspect of the algorithm is a new procedure that parameterizes the cross-sectional distribution, which makes it possible to avoid Monte Carlo integration.The paper also develops a new simulation procedure that not only avoids cross-sectional sampling vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has three advantages. One, it does not introduce additional sampling error that must be removed for the households' aggregate behavior to be consistent with the law of large numbers; as noted in Algan et al (2007), sampling error may be significant for certain conditional moments, so avoiding Monte Carlo approaches for the cross-section can be important. Two, it can be applied to economies in which the mean of the idiosyncratic shock depends on individual decisions and is thus not known in advance, such as a search model of unemployment; imposing the law of large numbers would not be feasible without knowledge of the mean.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has three advantages. One, it does not introduce additional sampling error that must be removed for the households' aggregate behavior to be consistent with the law of large numbers; as noted in Algan et al (2007), sampling error may be significant for certain conditional moments, so avoiding Monte Carlo approaches for the cross-section can be important. Two, it can be applied to economies in which the mean of the idiosyncratic shock depends on individual decisions and is thus not known in advance, such as a search model of unemployment; imposing the law of large numbers would not be feasible without knowledge of the mean.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many applications it may be appropriate to use a smooth representation of the cross-sectional density (for example, an exponential of polynomials as in Algan et al, 2008). Here I use a non-smooth approximation, namely a histogram.…”
Section: Representing Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure to solve for the policy rules uses standard projection techniques without a simulation step. Algan et al (2008) (AAD hereafter) propose a new procedure to simulate cross-sections with a continuum of agents. The most common procedure to simulate models with a continuum of agents consists of using a finite number of agents and a random number generator to draw the idiosyncratic shocks.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%