Abstract:a b s t r a c tThis note describes how the incomplete markets model with aggregate uncertainty in Den Haan et al. [Comparison of solutions to the incomplete markets model with aggregate uncertainty. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, this issue] is solved using standard quadrature and projection methods. This is made possible by linking the aggregate state variables to a parameterized density that describes the cross-sectional distribution. A simulation procedure is used to find the best shape of the de… Show more
“…Most prior studies compare different solution methods for the stochastic growth model and its extensions. Prominent examples include Aruoba, Fernández-Villaverde, and Rubio-Ramírez (2006), Caldara, Fernández-Villaverde, Rubio-Ramírez, andYao (2012), andLevintal (2016) for the baseline stochastic growth model, Algan, Allais, and Den Haan (2010), Den Haan and Rendahl (2010), and Maliar, Maliar, and Valli (2011) for the incomplete markets model with heterogenous agents and aggregate uncertainty, as well as Kollmann, Maliar, Malin, and Pichler (2011), Maliar, Maliar, and Judd (2011), Malin, Krueger, and Kubler (2011 for the multicountry real business cycle model. We are not aware of any prior studies that compare solution methods for the DMP model.…”
An accurate global projection algorithm is critical for quantifying the basic moments of the Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides model. Log linearization understates the mean and volatility of unemployment, but overstates the volatility of labor market tightness and the magnitude of the unemployment-vacancy correlation. Log linearization also understates the impulse responses in unemployment in recessions, but overstates the responses in the market tightness in booms. Finally, the second-order perturbation in logs can induce severe Euler equation errors, which are often much larger than those from log linearization.
“…Most prior studies compare different solution methods for the stochastic growth model and its extensions. Prominent examples include Aruoba, Fernández-Villaverde, and Rubio-Ramírez (2006), Caldara, Fernández-Villaverde, Rubio-Ramírez, andYao (2012), andLevintal (2016) for the baseline stochastic growth model, Algan, Allais, and Den Haan (2010), Den Haan and Rendahl (2010), and Maliar, Maliar, and Valli (2011) for the incomplete markets model with heterogenous agents and aggregate uncertainty, as well as Kollmann, Maliar, Malin, and Pichler (2011), Maliar, Maliar, and Judd (2011), Malin, Krueger, and Kubler (2011 for the multicountry real business cycle model. We are not aware of any prior studies that compare solution methods for the DMP model.…”
An accurate global projection algorithm is critical for quantifying the basic moments of the Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides model. Log linearization understates the mean and volatility of unemployment, but overstates the volatility of labor market tightness and the magnitude of the unemployment-vacancy correlation. Log linearization also understates the impulse responses in unemployment in recessions, but overstates the responses in the market tightness in booms. Finally, the second-order perturbation in logs can induce severe Euler equation errors, which are often much larger than those from log linearization.
“…See, among others, Algan et al. (), Algan, Allais, and Den Haan (, ), Den Haan and Rendahl (), Den Haan (), Maliar, Maliar, and Valli (), Reiter (), and Young ().…”
I implement and compare five solution methods for a benchmark heterogeneous firms model with lumpy capital adjustment and aggregate uncertainty. The Krusell–Smith algorithm performs best within a group of methods using projection in the aggregate states. Another technique, Parameterization plus Perturbation, is much faster and performs best within a group of methods using perturbation in aggregates. However, projection and perturbation have nonoverlapping strengths and weaknesses. I highlight the resulting trade‐offs with several model extensions. I recommend that researchers apply projection methods to cases with large shocks or nonlinear dynamics, while cases with explicitly distributional channels at work favor perturbation.
“…Those are the backward induction procedure, referred to as BInduc throughout this paper, developed in Reiter (2009b), the parameterized distribution procedure, referred to as Param, of Algan et al (2009), and the explicit aggregation algorithm, referred to as Xpa, developed in den Haan and Rendahl (2009). These algorithms are summarized in the subsections on projection methods.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.