2008
DOI: 10.1137/040611781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Elliptic Finite Element Systems in Near-Linear Time with Support Preconditioners

Abstract: We consider linear systems arising from the use of the finite element method for solving scalar linear elliptic problems. Our main result is that these linear systems, which are symmetric and positive semidefinite, are well approximated by symmetric diagonally dominant matrices. Our framework for defining matrix approximation is support theory. Significant graph theoretic work has already been developed in the support framework for preconditioners in the diagonally dominant case, and in particular it is known … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown in [20] that O(log n) iterations of solves produce a good approximation to a basic eigenvector of a graph. More closely related to preconditioned iterative methods is a solver for elliptic finite element linear systems [4]. This work showed that such systems can be preconditioned with graph Laplacians and so they can be solved in nearly-linear time.…”
Section: The Laplacian Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in [20] that O(log n) iterations of solves produce a good approximation to a basic eigenvector of a graph. More closely related to preconditioned iterative methods is a solver for elliptic finite element linear systems [4]. This work showed that such systems can be preconditioned with graph Laplacians and so they can be solved in nearly-linear time.…”
Section: The Laplacian Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This factorization exists by part (a) of Theorem 3 applied to B [s] . Use (8), (26), part (a) of Lemma 4 and part (a) of Lemma 7 to show…”
Section: Proof Of Part (C) Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, they arise out of finite difference and finite element discretizations of partial differential equations and in the solution of Markov modeling problems [1,5,8,26]. Diagonally dominant matrices enjoy excellent theoretical and numerical properties that are explained in classical references [7,[29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our choice is motivated by the potential for immediate impact on the design of industrial strength code for important applications. In contrast to AMG, CMG offers strong convergence guarantees for the class of symmetric diagonally dominant (SDD) matrices [23,13,4], and under certain conditions for the even more general class of symmetric M -matrices [17]. The convergence guarantees are based on recent progress in spectral graph theory and combinatorial preconditioning (see for example [12], [27]).…”
Section: Combinatorial Multigridmentioning
confidence: 99%