2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvent additives for tuning the photovoltaic properties of polymer–fullerene solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Indeed, formation of a skin layer of polymer has also been observed in the literature. [21][22][23] Here we observe that V FB shifts significantly with the processing conditions from 0.47 V (solvent) to 0.35V (solvent + thermal). Preparing devices with full coverage of either polymer or fullerene (see Supporting Information) we can correlate these V FB values with fullerene coverage of 97% and 68%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…12 Indeed, formation of a skin layer of polymer has also been observed in the literature. [21][22][23] Here we observe that V FB shifts significantly with the processing conditions from 0.47 V (solvent) to 0.35V (solvent + thermal). Preparing devices with full coverage of either polymer or fullerene (see Supporting Information) we can correlate these V FB values with fullerene coverage of 97% and 68%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In Figure 2 the AFM images for the different blends are shown. The average RMS roughness is about 1.1 nm and 4.6 nm for the blend prepared from oDCB and oDCB+THN, respectively [8]. In literature several authors report the positive correlation between increased blend surface roughness and increased solar cell efficiency in bulk heterojunction solar cells [8,[29][30][31].…”
Section: Noise Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The film ordering strongly influences the absorption spectra of the P3HT:PCBM layer. In particular, the shoulder located at 620 nm gives an indication of the P3HT crystallinity in the blend, for details see [8] and references therein. For the samples here investigated, the relative intensity of the shoulder at 620 nm appears to be more pronounced in the blend deposited from oDCB+THN [8].…”
Section: Electrical Transport and Structural Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations