2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soluble solid content and firmness index assessment and maturity discrimination of Malus micromalus Makino based on near-infrared hyperspectral imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction accuracy of the G and I models was also good, of which the R 2 , MAE, and RMSE of the G model reached 0.63, 0.1, and 0.13, respectively, which were better than those of the I model; however, the consistency index ( d ) of the G model was 0.7, which was slightly lower than the 0.73 of the I model. The GPI evaluation index was used to comprehensively evaluate the indicators of each prediction model [ 13 ]. The three models with greatest evaluation scores were the R , G , and I models, and their comprehensive evaluation scores were 0.87, 0.39, and 0.14, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prediction accuracy of the G and I models was also good, of which the R 2 , MAE, and RMSE of the G model reached 0.63, 0.1, and 0.13, respectively, which were better than those of the I model; however, the consistency index ( d ) of the G model was 0.7, which was slightly lower than the 0.73 of the I model. The GPI evaluation index was used to comprehensively evaluate the indicators of each prediction model [ 13 ]. The three models with greatest evaluation scores were the R , G , and I models, and their comprehensive evaluation scores were 0.87, 0.39, and 0.14, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the support of imaging technology and machine vision technology, crop maturity prediction has gradually become a popular research topic [ 8 – 10 ]. Previous studies have used image technology to predict crop maturity, mainly via spectral information prediction [ 11 ], electronic noses, and electronic tongues [ 12 ] combined with partial least squares regression analysis and via color eigenvalues combined with back-propagation neural networks [ 13 ]. The BP neural network is considered a highly accurate model when the internal mechanism and relation are uncertain [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A certain amount of noise and interference information was generated due to external factors during the data acquisition [ 40 ]. Hence, preprocessing the original spectra is necessary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test this further, we evaluated the preservative effect of CMs on peaches by detecting freshness parameters including SSC and TA. The SSC of peach fruit was measured by a refractometer (Rudolph, New York, USA) as described by Gao et al 32 Peach fruit (20 g) was mashed for 5 min at speed of 5000 rpm. The homogenate was filtered by gauze, and two drops were put on the central prism of the refractometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%