2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solubility of aerosol trace elements: Sources and deposition fluxes in the Canary Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(109 reference statements)
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, various satellite and model data used in this study do not provide quantitative information about dust depositions onto the study area [83][84][85], suggesting that high AI values are not necessarily associated with high iron deposition rates [54,86,87]. Secondly, iron solubility, which is an important consideration in assessing the impact of dust depositions on OPP [88,89], may be different according to the aerosol source types and deposition mode [90][91][92][93][94]. It was reported that iron solubility was widely ranged from~1 to 49% during the dust events in the North Pacific Ocean [95][96][97][98][99].…”
Section: Uncertainties Of the Atmospheric Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Firstly, various satellite and model data used in this study do not provide quantitative information about dust depositions onto the study area [83][84][85], suggesting that high AI values are not necessarily associated with high iron deposition rates [54,86,87]. Secondly, iron solubility, which is an important consideration in assessing the impact of dust depositions on OPP [88,89], may be different according to the aerosol source types and deposition mode [90][91][92][93][94]. It was reported that iron solubility was widely ranged from~1 to 49% during the dust events in the North Pacific Ocean [95][96][97][98][99].…”
Section: Uncertainties Of the Atmospheric Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although in the literature there are recent estimates of trace metals solubility from dust (e.g., Chance et al, ; López‐García et al, ; Mackey et al, ; Ravelo‐Pérez et al, ; Winton et al, ), solubility percentages are usually as variable as reported values of atmospheric dust deposition in the ocean. The reasons for such variability include the origin, load, and geochemical characteristics of dust (Baker et al, ; Jickells et al, ; Sholkovitz et al, ) as well as a lack of consensus among the methodologies used for its estimation (Meskhidze et al, ; Raiswell et al, ; Schulz et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the AAS technique (and the equivalent ICP-MS technique (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry)), non-destructive techniques are applicable and are generally referred to as X-ray fluorescence (XRF) [28][29][30][31][32]. The detailed characterisation and application of AAS and XRF were presented in a paper by Galvão et al [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%