2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2016.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solubility and thermodynamic properties of SO 2 in three low volatile urea derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical absorption and chemical absorption part were described, respectively, by Henry's law (Equation ()) and the reaction equilibrium (Equation ()): Pgoodbreak=HmγSO2()mSO2m K0goodbreak=γSO2IL()mSO2ILmPP0γIL()mILm The relationship equation between the total solubility of SO 2 in PIL and the partial pressure of SO 2 is similar to that reported in the literature 40,44 . Henry's constant ( H m ) and reaction equilibrium constant ( K 0 ) were obtained by fitting Equation () to Figure 5 for the two absorbents at different temperatures, and the fitted correlation coefficient R 2 > 0.99. normalmtgoodbreak=mIL0K0PK0P+1goodbreak+PHm mIL0goodbreak=103MIL Table 3 summarizes the absorption thermodynamic parameters K 0 and H m for SO 2 absorption in TMEA and [TMEA][Im].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The physical absorption and chemical absorption part were described, respectively, by Henry's law (Equation ()) and the reaction equilibrium (Equation ()): Pgoodbreak=HmγSO2()mSO2m K0goodbreak=γSO2IL()mSO2ILmPP0γIL()mILm The relationship equation between the total solubility of SO 2 in PIL and the partial pressure of SO 2 is similar to that reported in the literature 40,44 . Henry's constant ( H m ) and reaction equilibrium constant ( K 0 ) were obtained by fitting Equation () to Figure 5 for the two absorbents at different temperatures, and the fitted correlation coefficient R 2 > 0.99. normalmtgoodbreak=mIL0K0PK0P+1goodbreak+PHm mIL0goodbreak=103MIL Table 3 summarizes the absorption thermodynamic parameters K 0 and H m for SO 2 absorption in TMEA and [TMEA][Im].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Thermodynamic properties can contribute to the understanding of the dissolution process of SO 2 in absorbents. Fitting the adsorption isotherm in Figure 5 with the reaction equilibrium thermodynamic model, the Henry's constant and the reaction equilibrium constant of SO 2 absorption at different temperatures can be fitted 38,44 . From the above conclusion, the absorption of SO 2 was divided into a physical absorption part and a chemical absorption part, which can be expressed by the following Equations () and (): SO20.25em()gSO20.25em()L SO20.25em()ggoodbreak+IL0.25em()LSO2IL0.25em()L …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, the activity coefficient γ is regarded as 1. Part of the derivation process is similar to Huang and Deng et al Finally, a simple derivation yields eq , in which the Henry constant of absorption and the reaction equilibrium constant can be obtained by fitting the isotherm. The fitted results are recorded in Table . On the basis of the calculated results, the equilibrium constant K 0 of SO 2 in [TMEA]­[MOAc] is larger than those of the remaining three PILs, while the Henry constant H m of [TMEA]­[MOAc] is the smallest, indicating that [TMEA]­[MOAc] is the strongest for both chemical and physical affinities of SO 2 .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Δ phy H m can be obtained by fitting ln H m and 1/ T according to eq , , and the fitted curves are shown in Figure S6. Δ chem H m was calculated according to eq As shown in Table , the negative values of Δ phy H m mean that the physical absorption of SO 2 in PILs is also an exothermic process. Particularly, in [TMEA]­[MOAC], Δ phy H m and Δ chem H m are −37.434 and −17.191 kJ·mol –1 , respectively, which more clearly indicates that physical absorption captures SO 2 better than chemical absorption.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, many new substances and materials have been studied to capture SO 2 from flue gas such as organic solvents, deep eutectic solvents (DESs), metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), supported ionic liquid phase materials, , etc. However, the practical utilization of these are subject to secondary pollution, high cost of the operation processes, unknown toxicity, loss of structural integrity, limited reusability of the absorbents, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%