Solid waste management and urban environmental quality of public space in Chiclayo, Peru

Arteaga, Carlos L.; Silva, J.M.C. Da; Yarasca-Aybar, Cristian

doi:10.1016/j.cacint.2023.100112

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results revealed that urban solid waste management has had a negative impact on the layout of public spaces. This impact is negatively reflected in the biotic, abiotic and sociocultural aspects of the urban environment [21]. This study provides evidence of how city governance affects territorial sustainability.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 81%

Education and awareness: keys to solid waste reduction

Andrade-Arenas,

Espinoza

2024

IJEECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the research, education, and awareness were focused on as essential pillars to successfully address the problem of reducing solid waste. The objective is to implement educational and awareness solutions within the community to encourage a substantial change in behavior toward the reduction of solid waste. The design thinking methodology was applied to develop effective solutions. To measure the level of public awareness, we conducted interviews using the Atlas ti22 which allowed us to triangulate with the surveys that revealed that 60% of those surveyed agreed with the policies regarding environmental impact, 55% agreed that the authorities take preventive measures regarding public health and 58% stated that the participation of the citizens in recycling programs. Then, innovative prototypes were developed that satisfied the real needs of users and experts in their evaluation, thus laying a solid foundation. It was concluded that citizens as well as authorities must be aware that by working collaboratively, we can contribute to society.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 81%

Education and awareness: keys to solid waste reduction

Andrade-Arenas,

Espinoza

2024

IJEECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The stakeholders that were usually involved in the decision-making process are listed in Table 13. Similar to the ones listed for social indicators, stakeholder perspectives are captured by using questionnaires [117,[125][126][127][128][129], interviews [119,130], literature surveys, and governance [131]. A common practice is to consider stakeholder input when implementing MADM.…”

Section: Stakeholdersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Feo and Williams [127] used a structured questionnaire focusing on understanding and reporting the views and knowledge of people regarding WM operations and facilities. Other questionnaires were used to determine the level of social satisfaction [129] and social involvement [117]. Nguyen et al [133] conducted face-to-face interviews and a field survey to investigate stakeholders' opinions from government authorities, workers, the private sector, and WM experts, whereas Fichtel and Duram [119] conducted openended interviews to examine the role of the community members and government officials in SWM.…”

Section: Stakeholdersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decision Support Frameworks in Solid Waste Management: A Systematic Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Sustainability and Social Indicators

Gutierrez-Lopez,

McGarvey,

Costello

et al. 2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Waste management is a critical sector that needs to co-ordinate its activities with outcomes that impact society. Multi-criteria decision-making methods for waste management have been widely considered using environmental and economic criteria. With the development of new social regulations and concerns, sustainable waste management needs to additionally target socially acceptable practices. Despite the need to aid solid waste management decision-makers in contemplating the three pillars of sustainability, a limited inclusion of social impact has been found in the multi-objective decision-making literature. This study presents a systematic literature review of multi-criteria decision-making methods in solid waste management. The purpose of this study is threefold. (1) Emphasize the application of multi-objective decision-making methods, summarizing the models that have been used and their applications; (2) provide insights into the quantification of social aspects and their inclusion in decision-making methods, providing a list of social indicators collected from the reviewed studies; (3) offer an analysis of stakeholders’ involvement in waste management. From the articles investigated, one can observe the importance of understanding the local context in which the waste management system is located and the necessity of community consultation to recognize the potential challenges and improvements to solid waste management systems. Consequently, the involvement of stakeholders is crucial during the quantification process of social indicators. In alignment with the findings and needs raised by this review, a methodological approach is suggested for integrating optimization, social aspects, and stakeholders under a waste management context.

show abstract

Solid Waste Management and Sustainability in Deltas: Introduction and Updates

Nasr

2024

Deltas of the World

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Solid waste management and urban environmental quality of public space in Chiclayo, Peru

Cited by 11 publications

References 21 publications

Education and awareness: keys to solid waste reduction

Education and awareness: keys to solid waste reduction

Decision Support Frameworks in Solid Waste Management: A Systematic Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Sustainability and Social Indicators

Solid Waste Management and Sustainability in Deltas: Introduction and Updates

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About