2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid-state compounding of immiscible PCL-PEO blend powders for molding processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, XRD results (Figure 6a) showed that PCL had a high narrow diffraction peak at 21 • , and there was a lower diffraction peak at 24 • . It was a typical XRD result of PCL, which was similar to the results from other researches [37,38]. PECL was also observed to have these two diffraction peaks, but the strength is significantly reduced, indicating that the presence of the PEG block was not conducive to crystallization.…”
Section: Characterization Of Pcl Porous Microspheressupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Then, XRD results (Figure 6a) showed that PCL had a high narrow diffraction peak at 21 • , and there was a lower diffraction peak at 24 • . It was a typical XRD result of PCL, which was similar to the results from other researches [37,38]. PECL was also observed to have these two diffraction peaks, but the strength is significantly reduced, indicating that the presence of the PEG block was not conducive to crystallization.…”
Section: Characterization Of Pcl Porous Microspheressupporting
confidence: 86%
“…DSC analyses of the moulded solid dispersions 1, 2, and 3 revealed a single melting peak corresponding to the crystalline fraction of PEO at temperatures of 67 °C in T onset 58 °C (Δ H m = 137 J g −1 ), 67 °C in T onset 57 °C (Δ H m = 107 J g −1 ), and 65 °C in T onset 56 °C (Δ H m = 72 J g −1 ), respectively. As the fraction of PCL increased from 35% to 45% inside the formulations, it was possible to identify a small “shoulder” besides the PEO melting peak due to their immiscibility [ 26 , 44 ]. The decrease in the heat of fusion amount was already indicative of the crystallinity change within the system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After analysing the diffractogram of each polymer before and after the melt processing techniques, PEO’s main diffraction peaks at 19.09 and 23.24° [ 52 ] reduced expressively, followed by PCL diffraction peaks at 21.53 and 23.76° [ 53 ] almost disappearing, but the diffraction peak at 21.53° improved slightly due to the increase in PCL inside the formulations from 35 to 45%. The literature reports that PEO/PCL-blend–based matrices usually display convoluted peaks with intensities dependent on the blend composition [ 26 ]. Thus, these data endorse our thermal studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test results show that the heat treatment is not pertinent to the crystal formation of the blends. The diffraction peak of PCL appears at 2θ: 21.4°and 23.8° [25,26], and the diffraction peaks of PEG appear at 2θ: 19.2°and 23.3° [27]. PVA-PCL/PEG stents do not show other crystal formations after heat treatment, indicating that materials are immiscible [28].…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Tissue Engineering Stentsmentioning
confidence: 94%