2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-806x(03)00144-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid angle subtended by a cylindrical detector at a point source in terms of elliptic integrals

Abstract: The solid angle subtended by a right circular cylinder at a point source located at an arbitrary position generally consists of a sum of two terms: that defined by the cylindrical surface (Ω cyl ) and the other by either of the end circles (Ω circ ). We derive an expression for Ω cyl in terms of elliptic integrals of the first and third kinds and give similar expressions for Ω circ using integrals of the first and second kinds. These latter can be used alternatively to an expression also in terms of elliptic i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the fact that the solid angle subtended by the detector is greatest at the center of the front of the detector and the center of the side, as previously described in [9]. This difference was clearly visible without conducting statistical tests.…”
Section: Peak Analysismentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to the fact that the solid angle subtended by the detector is greatest at the center of the front of the detector and the center of the side, as previously described in [9]. This difference was clearly visible without conducting statistical tests.…”
Section: Peak Analysismentioning
confidence: 79%
“…halfway down the side of the detector, the relative sum peak area was roughly five times greater than when the radiation source was placed behind the detector. This is due to the fact that the solid angle subtended by the detector is greatest at the center of the front of the detector and the center of the side, as previously described in [9]. This difference was clearly visible without conducting statistical tests.…”
Section: Peak Analysismentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The case of an isotropic point source has been treated to great extent (Jaffey (1954), Macklin (1957), Masket et al (1956), Masket (1957), Gillespie (1970), Gardner and Verghese (1971), Green et al (1974), Prata (2003b)). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many situations in radiation physics the value of the solid angle subtended by a circular cylindrical detector at a point source is needed. The case of an isotropic point source has been treated to great extent (Jaffey (1954), Macklin (1957), Masket et al (1956), Masket (1957), Gillespie (1970), Gardner and Verghese (1971), Green et al (1974), Prata (2003b)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem was solved in [4] via a Fourier-Legendre series approximation for Ω. An exact formula, however, was mentioned by Maxwell [5] in 1873, explicitly given by Tallqvist [6] in 1931, and subsequently rediscovered several times [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%