Mobility of Visually Impaired People 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54446-5_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid: A Model to Analyse the Accessibility of Transport Systems for Visually Impaired People

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Train users encounter more problems than those who use other means of transport. In many cases, they have to rely on their own judgment to accomplish certain tasks, such as buying tickets, reading fares, and moving to a platform [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Such tasks require auditory cues based on the behavior of other users, and these may not be available when needed, as discussed in [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Train users encounter more problems than those who use other means of transport. In many cases, they have to rely on their own judgment to accomplish certain tasks, such as buying tickets, reading fares, and moving to a platform [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Such tasks require auditory cues based on the behavior of other users, and these may not be available when needed, as discussed in [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not surprising, as among our sample of 218 critical incidents, 208 deal with situations where people have to go to a specific destination, often at a specific time. Uzan and Wagstaff (2018) proposed five possible categories of motives for an urban journey: physical activity, social activity (e.g., walking around with someone), exploration of an environment, regular route (e.g., going to work), or reaching a place, object or person. The latter two motives comprise more than 95% of the complex situations in our sample.…”
Section: Consequences Of the Complex Situations: Similarities Across mentioning
confidence: 99%