2018
DOI: 10.1177/0001699318780966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soldiers without a war? Public and private framings of Norway’s engagement in Afghanistan

Abstract: This article examines how the military engagement in Afghanistan has been framed in the Norwegian public sphere and by veterans who have participated on the ground. Drawing on public documents and personal interview data, the analysis demonstrates how different frames were used in the public and private spheres to convey the meaning of the operation. The analysis focuses in particular on the mismatch experienced by the veterans between the official framing of the operation as a humanitarian endeavor, and their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I have tried to demonstrate the utility of studying metaphors when one wants to unpack the underlying logic of terrorism discourse. Metaphors, however, are only one type of cultural structure, and we need studies that examine others, such as narratives (Smith, 2005; Rafoss, 2015a) and framing (Gustavsen and Rafoss, 2018). Furthermore, culturalist studies should also ‘anchor causality in proximate actors and agencies’ (Alexander and Smith, 2003: 14), that is, examine in what ways cultural factors interact with historical actors and institutions.…”
Section: The Intelligibility Of Evilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have tried to demonstrate the utility of studying metaphors when one wants to unpack the underlying logic of terrorism discourse. Metaphors, however, are only one type of cultural structure, and we need studies that examine others, such as narratives (Smith, 2005; Rafoss, 2015a) and framing (Gustavsen and Rafoss, 2018). Furthermore, culturalist studies should also ‘anchor causality in proximate actors and agencies’ (Alexander and Smith, 2003: 14), that is, examine in what ways cultural factors interact with historical actors and institutions.…”
Section: The Intelligibility Of Evilmentioning
confidence: 99%