2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-011-9896-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Flare Prediction Using Advanced Feature Extraction, Machine Learning, and Feature Selection

Abstract: Citation: Ahmed OW, Qahwaji RSR, Colak T, Higgins PAB, Gallagher P and Bloomfield S (2013) Solar flare prediction using advanced feature extraction, machine learning and feature selection. Solar Physics. 283(1): 157-175. Abstract: Novel machine-learning and feature-selection algorithms have been developed to study: (i) the flare prediction capability of magnetic feature (MF) properties generated by the recently developed Solar Monitor Active Region Tracker (SMART); (ii) SMART's MF properties that are most sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
146
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
146
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering classes C, M, and X, some methods consider "Positive" forecasts for classes greater than or equal to "C" [7], others consider "Positive" for forecasts greater than or equal to a class M solar flare [8][9][10][11], and others forecast individual probabilities for each class (C, M, X).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering classes C, M, and X, some methods consider "Positive" forecasts for classes greater than or equal to "C" [7], others consider "Positive" for forecasts greater than or equal to a class M solar flare [8][9][10][11], and others forecast individual probabilities for each class (C, M, X).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find forecasting methods using Support Vector Machines [9,12,13], Artificial Neural Networks [7,10,12,14], C4.5 decision trees [5,11,[15][16][17], Naive Bayes [12] and Bayesian Networks [15]. The majority of the works tries different classifiers, looking for the one that achieves the best results according to the adopted criteria.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, a set of scalar properties is derived from line of sight (LOS) or vector magnetogram and analyzed in a supervised classification context to derive which combination of properties is predictive of increased flaring activity (Leka & Barnes 2004;Guo et al 2006;Barnes et al 2007;Georgoulis & Rust 2007;Schrijver 2007;Falconer et al 2008;Song et al 2009;Huang et al 2010;Yu et al 2010;Lee et al 2012;Ahmed et al 2013;Bobra & Couvidat 2015). Examples of scalar properties include: sunspot area, total unsigned magnetic flux, flux imbalance, neutral line length, maximum gradients along the neutral line, or other proxies for magnetic connectivity within ARs.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d ASAP's team at University of Bradford carried out joint research work with Trinity College Dublin (Ahmed et al 2013) to develop novel machine-learning and feature-selection algorithms to combine two of the recent developments in solar physics and space weather, which are ASAP and the Solar Monitor Active Region Tracker (SMART) system (Higgins et al 2011). SMART extracts, characterizes, and tracks the evolution of active regions across the solar disk using line-of-sight magnetograms and a combination of image processing techniques.…”
Section: Operational Modeling For Nowcasting and Forecasting Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work data mining and spatiotemporal association algorithms were developed to associate MFs with flares in order to differentiate flaring and non-flaring MFs and enable the application of machine-learning algorithms for flares prediction. The prediction performance is assessed using standard forecast-verification measures and compared with the prediction measures of ASAP (Ahmed et al 2013). d ASAP's team at University of Bradford carried out joint research with Royal Observatory of Belgium (ROB), Glasgow University, and Trinity College Dublin (Verbeeck et al 2013).…”
Section: Operational Modeling For Nowcasting and Forecasting Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%