2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.02.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar District Heating in East Germany – Transformation in a Cogeneration Dominated City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons behind the underperformance of the system compared to the simulated results are thermal properties of the borehole storage, tank stratification issues, pump controls, heat losses through the network due to high temperatures, and lower than expected collector efficiency. Hence, it shows that these common reasons are the main causes that can affect the performance of the system and cause a deviation in the measured and estimated performance (Bauer, et al, 2010;Urbaneck, et al, 2015). Other than the abovementioned issues, some other reasons can also decrease the performance of the system.…”
Section: Btesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons behind the underperformance of the system compared to the simulated results are thermal properties of the borehole storage, tank stratification issues, pump controls, heat losses through the network due to high temperatures, and lower than expected collector efficiency. Hence, it shows that these common reasons are the main causes that can affect the performance of the system and cause a deviation in the measured and estimated performance (Bauer, et al, 2010;Urbaneck, et al, 2015). Other than the abovementioned issues, some other reasons can also decrease the performance of the system.…”
Section: Btesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design solar fractions are overestimated, and measurements showed that in a real application, the systems underperformed. The main common reasons found are, a higher than expected net return temperature, efficiency issues in the heat exchanger and collector, losses through storage, and wrong sizing due to non-optimized solutions (Bauer, et al, 2010;Urbaneck, et al, 2015). In the project installed and monitored in Steinfurt-Borghorst, Hamburg, and Neckarsulm II, the results showed a deviation between the designed performance and the monitored performance.…”
Section: Btesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These plants are often operating as base load power producers and can supply heat and electricity at a cost-efficient level during summer and winter due to funding through the CHP production law (KWKG) [3]. In addition to the availability of low-cost heat, high and very high system temperatures in the DH systems also prevented solar heat generating systems [4]. In the example cases of the DH system in Chemnitz and Salzburg, only a large change in the system structure in one district made a change feasible [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the availability of low-cost heat, high and very high system temperatures in the DH systems also prevented solar heat generating systems [4]. In the example cases of the DH system in Chemnitz and Salzburg, only a large change in the system structure in one district made a change feasible [4,5]. Possibilities of including solar collector systems in existing DH networks that are not about to change radically and are using large scale CHP plants as a main heat source were rarely analysed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reiter et al [17] proposed a 500,000 m² solar district heating plant for the whole city of Graz, Austria. Urbaneck et al [18] found a solar fraction of about 10 % can be reached easily from technical and economic points of view based on conventional district heating (DH) systems in east Germany. In addition, Bauer et al [19] found that solar district heating systems together with seasonal storage with solar fraction above 50% are technological and economic viability in a Germany project.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%