1999
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300030003x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Water Repellency: Effects of Water Content, Temperature, and Particle Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

15
187
5
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
187
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the spell between the two sampling campaigns conducted at Ciavolo, the WDPT decreased by a not significant 14% in the duff layer and increased by a factor of 2.5 in the mineral subsoil (Table 3). The observed decrease of WDPT was probably a consequence of the well document decrease of SWR as the initial water content increases (i.e., de Jonge et al, 1999;Dekker and Ritsema, 1994;Fér et al, 2016;Lichner et al, 2013a). For the mineral layer, the hydrophobicity increased notwithstanding the soil water content did not change and the organic matter content decreased ( Table 2) thus suggesting that amphiphilic hydrophobic compounds were probably leached from the surface duff as consequence of rainfall that occurred in autumn (Vogelmann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the spell between the two sampling campaigns conducted at Ciavolo, the WDPT decreased by a not significant 14% in the duff layer and increased by a factor of 2.5 in the mineral subsoil (Table 3). The observed decrease of WDPT was probably a consequence of the well document decrease of SWR as the initial water content increases (i.e., de Jonge et al, 1999;Dekker and Ritsema, 1994;Fér et al, 2016;Lichner et al, 2013a). For the mineral layer, the hydrophobicity increased notwithstanding the soil water content did not change and the organic matter content decreased ( Table 2) thus suggesting that amphiphilic hydrophobic compounds were probably leached from the surface duff as consequence of rainfall that occurred in autumn (Vogelmann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is generally found to be most extreme when soils are dry, declining and eventually disappearing as soils become wet (e.g., de Jonge et al, 1999;Dekker and Ritsema, 1994;Fér et al, 2016;Lichner et al, 2013a;Vogelmann et al, 2013) although the soil moisture water repellency relationship is nevertheless complex (Doerr et al, 2000). When wet, amphiphilic compounds produced by plants are hydrophilic, but below a critical moisture threshold, their hydrophilic ends are bond strongly with one another and the soil particles, while hydrophobic ends are oriented towards the free space inducing water repellency (Ma'shum and Farmer, 1985;Tschapek, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiated investigations about the dependence of water repellency from water content yielded, however, conflicting evidence for different soils: For example, Witter et al (1991) and Dekker and Ritsema (1994), amongst others, found very high intensities of water repellency for air-dry soil samples, whereas other authors report that the most pronounced water repellency was coinciding for water contents near wilting point (e.g. King 1981;De Jonge et al 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Jonge et al (1999) found that some soils are not water repellent at the very low water contents, but become water repellent as soil water content increases. After the single peak, water repellency decreases until the soils become wettable above certain water content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As soil water increases, water repellency falls, but increases again to a second maximum. After the second peak, water repellency decreases and the soils finally become wettable above a certain water content (De Jonge et al 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%