2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil quality indices following long-term conservation pasture management practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Soil quality (SQ) was investigated in a 16-yr wheat-soybean production system • No burning, high fertility, & irrigation improved soil organic C, total N, & yields • Reduced SQ under irrigation was linked to lower EC and K scores • Soil pH was the limiting factor for SQ in a notillage-high fertility system • The SMAF addressed the effects of long-term agricultural practices on SQ management goals (Amorim et al, 2020a;Karlen et al, 2006). The Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) (Andrews, Karlen, & Cambardella, 2004) is an example of a SQ evaluation tool and has been successfully applied to investigate the impacts of long-term conservation practices on SQ in numerous settings (Veum et al, 2015;Cherubin et al, 2016b;Amorim et al, 2020a;2020b;Karlen, Veum, Sudduth, Obrycki, & Nunes, 2019). Initially, a minimum dataset with soil biological, physical, and chemical indicators is defined, which can be obtained through principal component analysis (PCA) or expert knowledge (Andrews & Carroll, 2001;Cherubin et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• Soil quality (SQ) was investigated in a 16-yr wheat-soybean production system • No burning, high fertility, & irrigation improved soil organic C, total N, & yields • Reduced SQ under irrigation was linked to lower EC and K scores • Soil pH was the limiting factor for SQ in a notillage-high fertility system • The SMAF addressed the effects of long-term agricultural practices on SQ management goals (Amorim et al, 2020a;Karlen et al, 2006). The Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) (Andrews, Karlen, & Cambardella, 2004) is an example of a SQ evaluation tool and has been successfully applied to investigate the impacts of long-term conservation practices on SQ in numerous settings (Veum et al, 2015;Cherubin et al, 2016b;Amorim et al, 2020a;2020b;Karlen, Veum, Sudduth, Obrycki, & Nunes, 2019). Initially, a minimum dataset with soil biological, physical, and chemical indicators is defined, which can be obtained through principal component analysis (PCA) or expert knowledge (Andrews & Carroll, 2001;Cherubin et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, biological indicators such as SOC, microbial biomass C, and enzyme activity (Mbuthia et al., 2015; Nakajima, Shrestha, & Lal, 2016), and chemical indicators such as P and K (Amorim et al., 2020b; Karlen, Cambardella, Kovar, & Colvin, 2013) are sensitive to changes induced by long‐term management practices, and reflect the performance of soils for sustained crop productivity. The integration of individual soil indicators into an overall SQ index (SQI) can provide an overview of management practices at a regional scale and may assist land managers in decision‐making processes with respect to land use or function as a guide towards specific management goals (Amorim et al., 2020a; Karlen et al., 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Developed by Andrews et al (2004), the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) is a quantitative SQ evaluation tool that focuses on dynamic SQ properties. The SMAF method has become widely applied to assess soil responses to specific agricultural management systems over time and/or to compare and contrast various management practices (Amorim, Ashworth, Moore, et al, 2020;. The SMAF framework for conducting an assessment consists of (a) physical, chemical, and bio-…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All areas have received annual poultry litter applications. Figure credit: Amorim et al (2020) . Continuous treatments included: hayed (H), continuously grazed (CG), rotationally grazed (R), rotationally grazed with a buffer strip (RB), and rotationally grazed with a fenced riparian buffer (RBR).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%