2016
DOI: 10.17221/582/2016-pse
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil properties and yields of winter wheat after long-term growing of this crop in two contrasting rotations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was significantly lower for crop rotation B (by 18.2%), while the lowest yield was observed for cereal monoculture (by 33.6%). Also, the studies by Smagacz et al [33] demonstrate that the grain yield of wheat grown after cereals was lower than that obtained for wheat grown otherwise than in cereal monoculture. The studies by Morrison et al [34] show that the yield of wheat under conventional tillage was 22% higher for crop rotation than for cereal monoculture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It was significantly lower for crop rotation B (by 18.2%), while the lowest yield was observed for cereal monoculture (by 33.6%). Also, the studies by Smagacz et al [33] demonstrate that the grain yield of wheat grown after cereals was lower than that obtained for wheat grown otherwise than in cereal monoculture. The studies by Morrison et al [34] show that the yield of wheat under conventional tillage was 22% higher for crop rotation than for cereal monoculture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Wheat yield level is at risk to decrease, while wheat is grown in rotation with a large proportion of wheat (Bonciarelli et al, 2016). The increase of wheat yield had been found in crop rotations if pulses (Babulicová, 2016), oilseeds (Schillinger & Paulitz, 2018) or root crops (Smagacz, Kozieł, & Martyniuk, 2016) are wheat fore-crops in the rotation. Changing the sequence of crops grown on arable land is an opportunity to increase wheat yields, and it was claimed that this increase may be up to 20% (Kirkegaard et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%