1994
DOI: 10.1016/0167-1987(94)90098-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil physical properties as influenced by induced compaction under laboratory and field conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the field and lab models soil samples presented similar structure, resulting in equal LBC. This was similarly observed by Shafiq, Hassan and Ahmad (1994), in a comparison of laboratory and field measurements of some soil physical properties including penetration resistance and bulk density. They however observed that the laboratory measurement overpredicted the compaction compared to the field conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Most of the field and lab models soil samples presented similar structure, resulting in equal LBC. This was similarly observed by Shafiq, Hassan and Ahmad (1994), in a comparison of laboratory and field measurements of some soil physical properties including penetration resistance and bulk density. They however observed that the laboratory measurement overpredicted the compaction compared to the field conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Some physical properties of soil that may be affected by loosening include bulk density, soil strength, infiltration capacity, water redistribution within the soil and the moisture retention. Soil parameters that are adversely affected by compaction or loosening of soil particles are those that control the content and transmission of water, air, heat and nutrients (Shafiq et al, 1994). Soil dry bulk density and penetration resistance increased with increase in the number of traffic passes while air permeability has been found to decrease with increase traffic intensity (Mamman and Ohu, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was thought that this human activity might have changed the soil texture, which would then change their water retention characteristics. Since the soil density can reflect the compaction level of the land use (Shafiq et al 1994), the differences in solid phase distribution and soil density suggest the effects of human activities. Soil compaction may explain these differences because it affects the surface soil water content (Canarache et al 1984).…”
Section: Water Retention Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%