2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2022.e00566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil organic carbon (SOC) prediction in Australian sugarcane fields using Vis–NIR spectroscopy with different model setting approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies using Vis-NIR and pXRF together to predict soil OC have shown their applicability regardless of soil texture variability (Weindorf & Chakraborty, 2018), but testing using multinational datasets have not yet been completed. Zhao et al (2022) successfully applied Vis-NIR to assess soil OC in 639 samples in four sugarcane districts in Australia (R 2 > 0.7). Samples included five soil reference groups (Spaargaren & Deckers, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies using Vis-NIR and pXRF together to predict soil OC have shown their applicability regardless of soil texture variability (Weindorf & Chakraborty, 2018), but testing using multinational datasets have not yet been completed. Zhao et al (2022) successfully applied Vis-NIR to assess soil OC in 639 samples in four sugarcane districts in Australia (R 2 > 0.7). Samples included five soil reference groups (Spaargaren & Deckers, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al. (2022) successfully applied Vis‐NIR to assess soil OC in 639 samples in four sugarcane districts in Australia ( R 2 > 0.7). Samples included five soil reference groups (Spaargaren & Deckers, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research is the first step toward reversing the significant economic impact of SEC on Canadian agriculture, as well as encouraging the scientific community to pursue detailed research on developing new methodologies to distinguish accurately between SEC and crop yield costs from other important variables such as crop rotation, pathogens, crop nutrient uptake (i.e., nutrient stewardship), and climate impacts (e.g., drought). We suggest incorporating advanced remote sensing technologies, such as proximal soil sensing using soil-spectroscopy-based approaches, to assess SOC dynamics and their relationship with spatiotemporal crop yield variability [36][37][38][39]. Also, there have been recent advances in remote sensing technology for modeling large-scale SOC dynamics to generate accurate geospatial datasets of soil-erosion-related physical and chemical properties [40][41][42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCC represents how close a model prediction conforms to the ground truth data along a 45 degree line from the origin. For the CCC, there is an excellent model with CCC > 0.8, a moderate model with 0.8 > CCC > 0.65 and a poor model with CCC < 0.65 [24]. For predicting the TSS based on MSC+SG spectral preprocessing, the PLSR presented an RMSE, R 2 , RPD and CCC of 0.554 • Brix, 0.583, 1.54 and 0.693, respectively.…”
Section: Predictive Model Performance Based On Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 94%