2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0559-7_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Improvement Using Microbial: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noteworthy, Bibi et al (2018) reported that higher bacterial cell growth may not correspond to higher urease activity which does not necessarily translate to higher CaCO 3 yield. Rather, higher urease activity and the isolate potential to sustain and survive at a higher alkaline pH, other than bacterial growth are the basic parameters favouring the fundamental success of the MICP application process towards soil biostabilization (Wath & Pusadkar 2016;Bibi et al 2018). Based on the aforementioned basic factors (urease activity and pH), isolate O6w and O3a were favoured as the bacterial candidates that sustained the optimum conditions correct for calcium carbonate precipitation activity towards biotreatment of problematic soils.…”
Section: Quantification Of Urease Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noteworthy, Bibi et al (2018) reported that higher bacterial cell growth may not correspond to higher urease activity which does not necessarily translate to higher CaCO 3 yield. Rather, higher urease activity and the isolate potential to sustain and survive at a higher alkaline pH, other than bacterial growth are the basic parameters favouring the fundamental success of the MICP application process towards soil biostabilization (Wath & Pusadkar 2016;Bibi et al 2018). Based on the aforementioned basic factors (urease activity and pH), isolate O6w and O3a were favoured as the bacterial candidates that sustained the optimum conditions correct for calcium carbonate precipitation activity towards biotreatment of problematic soils.…”
Section: Quantification Of Urease Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial precipitation of calcium carbonate has proven its potential as a microbial geotechnologybased method that is adapted for soil improvement. It is applied for various soil improvement projects such as controlling erosion in rivers and coastal areas, enhancing the stability of non-piled and piled foundations, treating pavement surface, decreasing dust levels on exposed surfaces by binding together the dust particles, reinforcing soil for the enhancement of underground constructions (Wath & Pusadkar, 2016). There were several reports (Burbank et al, 2011;Jiang et al, 2016;Fujita et al, 2017;Krajewska 2018) that had drawn our attention to the possibility of stimulating in situ soil urease positive bacteria in natural soils.…”
Section: Soil and Sand Improvement Via Micpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a new type of foundation treatment technology, microbial grouting reinforcement has promoted advances in the field of soil strength solidification and modification [ 25 , 26 ]. However, few relevant studies have examined the seismic dynamic characteristics and response of saturated sand, and centrifuge shaking table model tests of microbial treatment of a liquefied sand foundation have rarely been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%