2004
DOI: 10.1081/css-120030593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Carbon Dioxide Evolution, Litter Decomposition, and Nitrogen Availability Four Years after Thinning in a Japanese Larch Plantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the initial condition immediately after defoliation, C concentration was higher in larch litter than broadleaf litter, whereas N concentration was lower for larch, resulting in a larger C:N ratio. A large C:N ratio of fresh litter was reported for Japanese larch (Son et al, 2004). The initial N concentration of 1.06% in larch litter was compatible with that measured at other Japanese larch forests (Osono et al, 2003;Son et al, 2004).…”
Section: Seasonal Variation In Litter Co 2 Productionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the initial condition immediately after defoliation, C concentration was higher in larch litter than broadleaf litter, whereas N concentration was lower for larch, resulting in a larger C:N ratio. A large C:N ratio of fresh litter was reported for Japanese larch (Son et al, 2004). The initial N concentration of 1.06% in larch litter was compatible with that measured at other Japanese larch forests (Osono et al, 2003;Son et al, 2004).…”
Section: Seasonal Variation In Litter Co 2 Productionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…A large C:N ratio of fresh litter was reported for Japanese larch (Son et al, 2004). The initial N concentration of 1.06% in larch litter was compatible with that measured at other Japanese larch forests (Osono et al, 2003;Son et al, 2004). Moreover, the C and N concentrations and a C:N ratio of broadleaf litter were within the range of those of other broadleaf species (Arunachalam et al, 1998;Wedderburn and Carter, 1999;Read and Lawrence, 2003).…”
Section: Seasonal Variation In Litter Co 2 Productionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The soil microclimate will also be affected as more radiation reaches the soil, photodegradation being one of the main drivers of litter decomposition and leading to a possible increase in soil temperature and reduced moisture. In turn, these effects could have a notable influence on the decomposition rate of organic matter, with an intensification of decomposition in moist climates (Son et al, 2004;Kunhamu et al, 2009) although the opposite could occur in drier climates (Blanco et al, 2011;LadoMonserrat et al, 2015;Bravo-Oviedo et al, 2017). All these processes can modify soil carbon content and this can be especially significant in the case of the forest floor.…”
Section: Harvesting Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvement of microclimates after thinning could accelerate the rate of litter decomposition in thinned plots (Grady and Hart, 2006;Son et al, 2004), as confirmed by the lower amount of litter in various gaps than in the control (Table 3). During the decomposition, part of C in litter could be transformed to SOC, leading to the increase in SOC in gaps compared with the control (Table 3).…”
Section: Changes In Biotic and Abiotic Factors By Thinningmentioning
confidence: 83%