2017
DOI: 10.5424/fs/2017262-11205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest management and carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean region: A review

Abstract: Aim of study: TTo review and acknowledge the value of carbon sequestration by forest management in the Mediterranean area. Material and methods:We review the main effects of forest management by comparing the effects of silvicultural systems (even-aged vs. uneven-aged stands, coppice systems, agroforestry systems), silvicultural options (thinning, rotation period, species composition), afforestation, harvesting, fire impact or effects of shrub layer on carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean area.Main result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
2
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are contrary to those found in some previous studies, where thinning operations had a non-significant or negative impact on soil C in Mediterranean pine forests [27,29,74] but not to those of other studies [10,66]. Thinning may improve C sequestration through several factors involved in SOC accumulation: variation in the quality and quantity of inputs (litterfall and logging residues), an increase in N use efficiency, protection of both new and old SOC in mineral-associated fractions (<50 µm) and a greater micro-climatic effect on litter decomposition [13,75,76], enhancing long-term storage in the soil [77].…”
Section: Stock In Biomass and Soc Under Different Thinning Intensitiescontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are contrary to those found in some previous studies, where thinning operations had a non-significant or negative impact on soil C in Mediterranean pine forests [27,29,74] but not to those of other studies [10,66]. Thinning may improve C sequestration through several factors involved in SOC accumulation: variation in the quality and quantity of inputs (litterfall and logging residues), an increase in N use efficiency, protection of both new and old SOC in mineral-associated fractions (<50 µm) and a greater micro-climatic effect on litter decomposition [13,75,76], enhancing long-term storage in the soil [77].…”
Section: Stock In Biomass and Soc Under Different Thinning Intensitiescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In line with our first hypothesis, the biomass C stock was significantly higher in control (unthinned) plots-which is consistent with estimates for other Aleppo pine stands in the region that support relatively low basal areas [64,65]; and for other pine species [27,66,67]. Thinning operations involve a loss of total biomass (without including also the biomass that is removed), which results in lower densities and basal areas in thinned stands [27]. In this study, the average biomass C stock calculated for P. halepensis forests ranged between 41.65 Mg ha −1 (unthinned plots) and 13.93 Mg ha −1 (heavy thinning).…”
Section: Stock In Biomass and Soc Under Different Thinning Intensitiessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most important cultural and social functions are the recreational, educational and leisure uses, opportunities for research, their traditional cultural and emotional values and the esthetics of pleasant landscapes, which give rise to important economic activities such as tourism and hiking [217]. Among these features and ecosystem services, the water resources and the storage of C are especially important for their implications in all these services, because they are the basis of the primary production that supports the services and because of the effects they have on climate change [218]. All previously discussed, global changes will clearly have an impact on many of these goods and services and will therefore affect socioeconomic systems [6].…”
Section: The Effects On Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, in mountainous ecosystems, forest area is very high and it is not possible to enhance further the carbon storage by afforestation or reforestation activities. In this case, the carbon storage can be enhanced only through IFM systems, that include different practices, mainly referred to: (1) extension of the rotation length, (2) reduction of woody biomass harvesting compared to the maximum volume allowed by forest management plans (FMPs), (3) conversion of aged and/or abandoned coppices to high forests, (4) increase of carbon retention in HWPs, (5) increase of the use of HWPs instead of more fossil-energy intensive materials, and (6) increase of the use of woody biofuels to substitute fossil fuels (Aruga et al 2013;Alberdi et al 2016;Ruiz-Peinado et al 2017;Vacchiano et al 2018). Each CC exchanged on a VCM promotes the mitigation of 1 t of CO 2 released into the atmosphere from anthropogenic activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%