“…The current knowledge about the internal and external validity of the psychological constructs, as well as, the prediction of outcomes are -in essence -based on information from the population or groups of individuals. Important predictors can be cited which their evidence based on population, such as (i) self-regulatory and mediated processes (Cardoso, Seabra, Gomes, & Fonseca, 2019;Dias et al, 2015;Golino, Gomes, Commons & Miller, 2014;Gomes, 2007Gomes, , 2010a; Gomes & Borges, 2009a;Gomes, Golino, Santos, & Ferreira, 2014;Pereira, Golino, M. T. S., & Gomes, 2019;Pires & Gomes, 2018;Reppold et al, 2015), (ii) personality (Gomes, 2012a;Gomes & Gjikuria, 2017;Gomes & Golino, 2012a), (iii) socioeconomics variables Gomes, Amantes & Jelihovschi, 2020;Gomes, Lemos, & Jelihovschi, 2020;Pazeto, Dias, Gomes & Seabra, 2019), (iv) intelligence (Alves, Gomes, Martins, & Almeida, 2016, 2017Golino & Gomes, 2019;Gomes, 2010bGomes, , 2011bGomes, , 2012bGomes & Borges, 2007, 2008b, 2009b, 2009cGomes, de Araújo, Ferreira & Golino, 2014;Gomes & Golino, 2012bMuniz, Gomes, & Pasian, 2016;Valentini et al, 2015), and (v) metacognition (Golino & Gomes, 2014a;Golino, Gomes, & Andrade, 2014;Gomes, Golino, & Menezes, 2014). The predictors with secondary importance follows the same rationality and their evidence are based on population, such as (vi) approaches to learning…”