Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/fose.2007.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Testing Research: Achievements, Challenges, Dreams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
378
0
62

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 602 publications
(441 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
378
0
62
Order By: Relevance
“…Code coverage criteria occupy a large part of software testing literature (Ammann and Offutt 2016;Bertolino 2007;Zhu et al 1997). Many authors aim at finding novel criteria that subsume existing ones or that improve fault-finding effectiveness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Code coverage criteria occupy a large part of software testing literature (Ammann and Offutt 2016;Bertolino 2007;Zhu et al 1997). Many authors aim at finding novel criteria that subsume existing ones or that improve fault-finding effectiveness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software testing can be based on many criteria (Ammann and Offutt 2016;Bertolino 2007;Zhu et al 1997). Among them, operational profile-based testing andcoverage-based testing provide two quite diverse approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. effectiveness of test data selection criteria and methods of generating test data [3,7,9], considerably less work has been done on the effectiveness of test oracles and their impact on the testing process [4,16,11,12]. Consequently, while we know that the choice of test oracle influences the testing process, we have few, if any techniques for selecting the test oracle, and little understanding of how our selection impacts the testing process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, model-driven testing [2] and modelbased interoperability testing [3] highlight the potential. However, these solutions focus on Web Services and require detailed models of the system's interface syntax (using WSDL) and behavior (using BPEL) in order to generate automated tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an IoT sensor produces event data according to the NSGI specification, 2 or streamed data content complies with a data format specification uploaded to the HyperCAT catalogue. -Interoperability testing; monitors the interaction between multiple systems to test whether they interoperate with one another, identifying the specific issues to be resolved where there is failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%