2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27618-8_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Resource Recommendation for Process Execution Based on the Organization’s Profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars Mehdi and David [18] took into account factors such as the different categories in the resource systems and the educational process of the resource subjects and proposed a recommendation model that is sensitive to students' learning ability level, and the proposed model contains three main function modules, namely the student ability level characterization module, the candidate learning resource characterization module, and the resource recommendation module. In the current knowledge push or resource recommendation services, the main reason for the inability to fully explore the information of the potential relationships between students, learning projects, and learning resources is the sparseness of data [19][20][21][22]. In order to improve the accuracy of knowledge push or resource recommendation, Yang et al [23] applied a resource content feature extraction optimization algorithm based on multi-source data fusion to the dynamic tracking of students' learning preferences; in order to avoid the problem of undiversified content that is commonly seen during resource recommendation, they also proposed a multi-user joint-comparison algorithm to evaluate the candidate learning resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars Mehdi and David [18] took into account factors such as the different categories in the resource systems and the educational process of the resource subjects and proposed a recommendation model that is sensitive to students' learning ability level, and the proposed model contains three main function modules, namely the student ability level characterization module, the candidate learning resource characterization module, and the resource recommendation module. In the current knowledge push or resource recommendation services, the main reason for the inability to fully explore the information of the potential relationships between students, learning projects, and learning resources is the sparseness of data [19][20][21][22]. In order to improve the accuracy of knowledge push or resource recommendation, Yang et al [23] applied a resource content feature extraction optimization algorithm based on multi-source data fusion to the dynamic tracking of students' learning preferences; in order to avoid the problem of undiversified content that is commonly seen during resource recommendation, they also proposed a multi-user joint-comparison algorithm to evaluate the candidate learning resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%