The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2021 International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technologies (IBCAST) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/ibcast51254.2021.9393250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Defect Prediction with Naïve Bayes Classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The KNN algorithm achieves very high accuracy [51] for uncovered faces but for covered faces, the accuracy drops down below 10% [50]. Rahim et al [52] used the NB algorithm to predict the errors which can happen from certain software and proposed three steps which when applied show high accuracy in detecting those errors [52]. Another paper discussed increasing the accuracy of the Naive Bayes algorithm when applied to artificial intelligence classification problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The KNN algorithm achieves very high accuracy [51] for uncovered faces but for covered faces, the accuracy drops down below 10% [50]. Rahim et al [52] used the NB algorithm to predict the errors which can happen from certain software and proposed three steps which when applied show high accuracy in detecting those errors [52]. Another paper discussed increasing the accuracy of the Naive Bayes algorithm when applied to artificial intelligence classification problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrizosa et al [54] aimed at decreasing its time consumption and the processing power required for running it. For interested readers in the equations of the three algorithms KNN, NB and RT kindly refer to [50], [52], [54], respectively. We use the Weka software [56] to solve the classification problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metrics provide insights into the structure and complexity of the code, which can be correlated with the likelihood of defects. It is widely used, as can be seen in [ 18 ], where Rahim et al proposed a Naïve Bayes Classifier for the identification of software application defects with a high accuracy, reaching 98.7%. The early detection of these defects in software systems can help developers remove them and, thus, improve the software quality before the deployment phase.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software defect prediction(SDP) has emerged as a popular research topic over the last several decades [3], [6], [7]. Researchers have utilized various classification techniques to build these models including Logistic Regression [8], Na¨ıve Bayes classifier [9], Support Vector Machine [8], Artificial Neural Networks [10], Decision Tree Classifiers [11], Random Forest Algorithms [12], kernel PCA [13], Deep Learning [14], combination of Kernel PCA and Deep Learning [15] [16] and ensemble learning techniques [17] etc. Aleem et al [3] explored different machine learning techniques for software bug detection and provided a comparative performance analysis of these algorithms.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%